Expand your knowledge base with the help of IDNLearn.com's extensive answer archive. Get comprehensive answers to all your questions from our network of experienced experts.

Lydia writes the equation below with a missing value.

[tex]\[ y = 5x - \square \][/tex]

She puts a value in the box and says that the equation represents a direct variation. Which explains whether the equation could represent a direct variation?

A. If she puts 0 in the box, she would have a direct variation.
B. If she puts 5 in the box, she would have a direct variation.
C. The equation is not of the form [tex]\( y = kx \)[/tex], so it cannot represent a direct variation.
D. The equation has a minus sign, so it cannot represent a direct variation.


Sagot :

To determine if the equation [tex]\( y = 5x - \square \)[/tex] represents a direct variation, we need to analyze the equation and compare it to the standard form of a direct variation equation.

A direct variation equation has the form:
[tex]\[ y = kx \][/tex]
where [tex]\( k \)[/tex] is a constant.

1. Original Equation:
[tex]\[ y = 5x - \square \][/tex]

2. Condition for Direct Variation:
For the equation to represent a direct variation, the term containing [tex]\(\square\)[/tex] must not alter the direct proportionality between [tex]\( y \)[/tex] and [tex]\( x \)[/tex]. This means the constant term must be zero to match the form [tex]\( y = kx \)[/tex].

3. Substitute 0 in the Box:
If Lydia puts 0 in the box, the equation becomes:
[tex]\[ y = 5x - 0 \][/tex]
which simplifies to:
[tex]\[ y = 5x \][/tex]

4. Analysis of the Modified Equation:
The modified equation [tex]\( y = 5x \)[/tex] is indeed of the form [tex]\( y = kx \)[/tex], where [tex]\( k = 5 \)[/tex]. Therefore, this represents a direct variation.

By comparing the modified equation to the standard form of a direct variation equation, we can conclude:

- If she puts 0 in the box, she would have a direct variation.

Thus, among the provided explanations, "If she puts 0 in the box she would have a direct variation" is the correct explanation.