Answered

IDNLearn.com: Your go-to resource for finding precise and accurate answers. Our experts provide timely and precise responses to help you understand and solve any issue you face.

Which of the following BEST describes Velleman's position regarding euthanasia?

A. There is no moral difference between active and passive euthanasia.
B. Patients have a right to both active and passive euthanasia.
C. The best policy regarding euthanasia is to have no policy, but allow the physician to use their discretion.
D. Patients have a right to only passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia is morally wrong.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

James Rachels argues that active euthanasia is preferable due to its ability to reduce patient suffering more effectively.


Explanation:

James Rachels challenges the notion that active euthanasia is morally wrong while passive euthanasia is permissible. He argues that the intent and result in both cases are the same, but active euthanasia can actually reduce patient suffering more effectively. Therefore, Rachels asserts that active euthanasia is preferable as it brings a swift end to suffering.


Learn more about Euthanasia here:

https://brainly.com/question/40871405


We appreciate your contributions to this forum. Don't forget to check back for the latest answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. IDNLearn.com is your go-to source for dependable answers. Thank you for visiting, and we hope to assist you again.