IDNLearn.com makes it easy to find precise answers to your specific questions. Discover reliable answers to your questions with our extensive database of expert knowledge.
Sagot :
Jayden and Alexa made mistakes in their calculations. Let's walk through their mistakes and provide the corrected solution step-by-step.
### Jayden's Approach
1. Jayden incorrectly simplified the combinations and treated the factorial calculations incorrectly. His attempt was:
[tex]\[\frac{6!}{2!(6-2)!} + \frac{6!}{3!(6-3)!} \neq \frac{7!}{3!(7-3)!}\][/tex]
Simplifying,
[tex]\[\frac{6!}{2! \cdot 4!} + \frac{6!}{3! \cdot 3!} \neq \frac{7!}{3! \cdot 4!}\][/tex]
2. Correct calculation of [tex]\({ }_6C_2\)[/tex] and [tex]\({ }_6C_3\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ { }_6C_2 = \frac{6!}{2! \cdot 4!} = \frac{6 \cdot 5}{2 \cdot 1} = 15 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ { }_6C_3 = \frac{6!}{3! \cdot 3!} = \frac{6 \cdot 5 \cdot 4}{3 \cdot 2 \cdot 1} = 20 \][/tex]
3. Sum of the calculated combinations:
[tex]\[ { }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = 15 + 20 = 35 \][/tex]
4. Correct calculation of [tex]\({ }_7C_3\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ { }_7C_3 = \frac{7!}{3! \cdot 4!} = \frac{7 \cdot 6 \cdot 5}{3 \cdot 2 \cdot 1} = 35 \][/tex]
Therefore, [tex]\({ }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = { }_7C_3\)[/tex] is indeed true as both sides simplify to 35.
### Alexa's Approach
1. Alexa's initial step was correct but her use of the least common denominator was convoluted. Here's the correction using combinations:
[tex]\[ { }_6C_2 = \frac{6!}{2! \cdot 4!} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ { }_6C_3 = \frac{6!}{3! \cdot 3!} \][/tex]
[tex]\(\Rightarrow\)[/tex]
[tex]\[ { }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = 15 + 20 \][/tex]
2. As before, the combined result is:
[tex]\[ 15 + 20 = 35 \][/tex]
3. Alexa’s final check:
[tex]\[ { }_7C_3 = \frac{7!}{3! \cdot 4!} \][/tex]
[tex]\(\Rightarrow\)[/tex]
[tex]\[ { }_7C_3 = 35 \][/tex]
So, once corrected, Alexa's result too shows [tex]\({ }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = { }_7C_3.\)[/tex]
### Conclusion
Both Jayden and Alexa made mistakes initially but when corrected, both paths show the correct result. The identity [tex]\({ }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = { }_7C_3\)[/tex] holds true since:
[tex]\[ 15 + 20 = 35,\][/tex]
and hence,
[tex]\[35 = 35.\][/tex]
Thus, Jayden and Alexa both arrive at the correct conclusion when their errors are corrected.
### Jayden's Approach
1. Jayden incorrectly simplified the combinations and treated the factorial calculations incorrectly. His attempt was:
[tex]\[\frac{6!}{2!(6-2)!} + \frac{6!}{3!(6-3)!} \neq \frac{7!}{3!(7-3)!}\][/tex]
Simplifying,
[tex]\[\frac{6!}{2! \cdot 4!} + \frac{6!}{3! \cdot 3!} \neq \frac{7!}{3! \cdot 4!}\][/tex]
2. Correct calculation of [tex]\({ }_6C_2\)[/tex] and [tex]\({ }_6C_3\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ { }_6C_2 = \frac{6!}{2! \cdot 4!} = \frac{6 \cdot 5}{2 \cdot 1} = 15 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ { }_6C_3 = \frac{6!}{3! \cdot 3!} = \frac{6 \cdot 5 \cdot 4}{3 \cdot 2 \cdot 1} = 20 \][/tex]
3. Sum of the calculated combinations:
[tex]\[ { }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = 15 + 20 = 35 \][/tex]
4. Correct calculation of [tex]\({ }_7C_3\)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ { }_7C_3 = \frac{7!}{3! \cdot 4!} = \frac{7 \cdot 6 \cdot 5}{3 \cdot 2 \cdot 1} = 35 \][/tex]
Therefore, [tex]\({ }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = { }_7C_3\)[/tex] is indeed true as both sides simplify to 35.
### Alexa's Approach
1. Alexa's initial step was correct but her use of the least common denominator was convoluted. Here's the correction using combinations:
[tex]\[ { }_6C_2 = \frac{6!}{2! \cdot 4!} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ { }_6C_3 = \frac{6!}{3! \cdot 3!} \][/tex]
[tex]\(\Rightarrow\)[/tex]
[tex]\[ { }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = 15 + 20 \][/tex]
2. As before, the combined result is:
[tex]\[ 15 + 20 = 35 \][/tex]
3. Alexa’s final check:
[tex]\[ { }_7C_3 = \frac{7!}{3! \cdot 4!} \][/tex]
[tex]\(\Rightarrow\)[/tex]
[tex]\[ { }_7C_3 = 35 \][/tex]
So, once corrected, Alexa's result too shows [tex]\({ }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = { }_7C_3.\)[/tex]
### Conclusion
Both Jayden and Alexa made mistakes initially but when corrected, both paths show the correct result. The identity [tex]\({ }_6C_2 + { }_6C_3 = { }_7C_3\)[/tex] holds true since:
[tex]\[ 15 + 20 = 35,\][/tex]
and hence,
[tex]\[35 = 35.\][/tex]
Thus, Jayden and Alexa both arrive at the correct conclusion when their errors are corrected.
Your presence in our community is highly appreciated. Keep sharing your insights and solutions. Together, we can build a rich and valuable knowledge resource for everyone. Thank you for visiting IDNLearn.com. We’re here to provide dependable answers, so visit us again soon.