Explore IDNLearn.com's extensive Q&A database and find the answers you're looking for. Get step-by-step guidance for all your technical questions from our dedicated community members.
Sagot :
To determine whether the given statement [tex]\((p \rightarrow a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a)\)[/tex] is a tautology, a contradiction, or a contingency, let's go through the evaluation step-by-step.
### Step 1: Understand the Statements
First, understand the logical components:
- [tex]\( p \rightarrow a \)[/tex] (If [tex]\( p \)[/tex], then [tex]\( a \)[/tex])
- [tex]\( \sim p \)[/tex] (Not [tex]\( p \)[/tex])
- [tex]\( \sim p \vee a \)[/tex] (Not [tex]\( p \)[/tex] or [tex]\( a \)[/tex])
- [tex]\( \leftrightarrow \)[/tex] (Logical equivalence)
### Step 2: Express in Truth Table
To evaluate this, we can use a truth table, but instead, we'll logically simplify to avoid an exhaustive truth table since the evaluation shows it's a special logical form.
### Step 3: Logical Equivalence
We'll analyze the logical equivalence:
The implication [tex]\( p \rightarrow a \)[/tex] can be rewritten as [tex]\( \sim p \vee a \)[/tex] because an implication is true in the same cases when "not [tex]\( p \)[/tex]" or [tex]\( a \)[/tex] is true.
The expression [tex]\((p \rightarrow a)\)[/tex] is logically equivalent to [tex]\((\sim p \vee a)\)[/tex]. Thus, [tex]\( (p \rightarrow a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a) \)[/tex] simplifies to:
### Step 4: Simplify the Statement
- Since [tex]\( p \rightarrow a \)[/tex] is equivalent to [tex]\( \sim p \vee a \)[/tex], rewriting the original statement:
[tex]\[ (p \rightarrow a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a) \][/tex]
becomes:
[tex]\[ (\sim p \vee a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a) \][/tex]
### Step 5: Simplified Expression
- The expression [tex]\( (\sim p \vee a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a) \)[/tex] should be evaluated.
Since any statement is logically equivalent to itself, this results in a true statement universally, i.e., a tautology. This is because both sides are exactly the same, thereby always resulting in true.
### Conclusion:
Given the analysis, the statement [tex]\((p \rightarrow a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a)\)[/tex] is always true regardless of the truth values of [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( a \)[/tex]. Hence, it is a tautology.
Thus, the statement pattern [tex]\((p \rightarrow a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a)\)[/tex] is a Tautology.
### Step 1: Understand the Statements
First, understand the logical components:
- [tex]\( p \rightarrow a \)[/tex] (If [tex]\( p \)[/tex], then [tex]\( a \)[/tex])
- [tex]\( \sim p \)[/tex] (Not [tex]\( p \)[/tex])
- [tex]\( \sim p \vee a \)[/tex] (Not [tex]\( p \)[/tex] or [tex]\( a \)[/tex])
- [tex]\( \leftrightarrow \)[/tex] (Logical equivalence)
### Step 2: Express in Truth Table
To evaluate this, we can use a truth table, but instead, we'll logically simplify to avoid an exhaustive truth table since the evaluation shows it's a special logical form.
### Step 3: Logical Equivalence
We'll analyze the logical equivalence:
The implication [tex]\( p \rightarrow a \)[/tex] can be rewritten as [tex]\( \sim p \vee a \)[/tex] because an implication is true in the same cases when "not [tex]\( p \)[/tex]" or [tex]\( a \)[/tex] is true.
The expression [tex]\((p \rightarrow a)\)[/tex] is logically equivalent to [tex]\((\sim p \vee a)\)[/tex]. Thus, [tex]\( (p \rightarrow a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a) \)[/tex] simplifies to:
### Step 4: Simplify the Statement
- Since [tex]\( p \rightarrow a \)[/tex] is equivalent to [tex]\( \sim p \vee a \)[/tex], rewriting the original statement:
[tex]\[ (p \rightarrow a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a) \][/tex]
becomes:
[tex]\[ (\sim p \vee a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a) \][/tex]
### Step 5: Simplified Expression
- The expression [tex]\( (\sim p \vee a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a) \)[/tex] should be evaluated.
Since any statement is logically equivalent to itself, this results in a true statement universally, i.e., a tautology. This is because both sides are exactly the same, thereby always resulting in true.
### Conclusion:
Given the analysis, the statement [tex]\((p \rightarrow a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a)\)[/tex] is always true regardless of the truth values of [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( a \)[/tex]. Hence, it is a tautology.
Thus, the statement pattern [tex]\((p \rightarrow a) \leftrightarrow (\sim p \vee a)\)[/tex] is a Tautology.
Thank you for being part of this discussion. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Your questions deserve reliable answers. Thanks for visiting IDNLearn.com, and see you again soon for more helpful information.