IDNLearn.com: Your go-to resource for finding expert answers. Ask anything and receive well-informed answers from our community of experienced professionals.

Why is the statement "The formation of a compound often involves the destruction of one or more atoms" inconsistent with Dalton's atomic theory?

A. Atoms change the way they are bound together when they form a new substance, but they are neither created nor destroyed.
B. In chemical reactions, compounds are neither created nor destroyed.
C. The formation of a compound often involves the formation of one or more atoms.
D. Atoms combine in simple, whole-number ratios to form compounds.


Sagot :

Final answer:

Dalton's atomic theory asserts that atoms combine in whole-number ratios to form compounds and are not created or destroyed in reactions.


Explanation:

Dalton's atomic theory states that atoms combine in simple, whole-number ratios to form compounds and atoms are neither created nor destroyed in a chemical reaction. This is inconsistent with the notion that the formation of a compound involves the destruction of atoms since atoms are conserved in chemical reactions, only rearranged.


Learn more about Atomic Theory and Chemical Reactions here:

https://brainly.com/question/41008926


Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Don't hesitate to keep asking and answering. We value every contribution you make. Your questions are important to us at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more reliable solutions.