Discover a world of knowledge and community-driven answers at IDNLearn.com today. Our experts are available to provide accurate, comprehensive answers to help you make informed decisions about any topic or issue you encounter.
Sagot :
To address the given expression [tex]\( 4 \sqrt{2} - 5 \sqrt{3} \)[/tex], let's go through each option one by one:
A. The two terms cannot be combined because the radicands are not identical, and cannot be simplified so that they are identical.
- This statement suggests that because [tex]\( \sqrt{2} \)[/tex] and [tex]\( \sqrt{3} \)[/tex] have different values under the radical sign (radicands), and these values cannot be changed to become the same, the terms cannot be combined.
- Correct. Since the radicands ([tex]\( 2 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( 3 \)[/tex]) are not the same, these terms cannot be combined.
B. The two terms cannot be combined because the indices are not identical.
- This statement would be relevant if we had different indices (such as [tex]\(\sqrt[3]{2}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(\sqrt{3}\)[/tex]), but in this case, both terms are square roots, so the indices are indeed the same.
- Incorrect. The indices for both terms in [tex]\( 4 \sqrt{2} - 5 \sqrt{3} \)[/tex] are the same (both are square roots).
C. The two terms cannot be combined because the resulting value of the subtraction would be negative.
- This statement is incorrect because combining terms based on whether the result is negative or positive doesn’t affect whether they can be combined or not.
- Incorrect. The possibility of a negative result does not factor into whether the terms can be combined in this algebraic context.
D. The two terms may be combined.
- This statement is suggesting that it is possible to combine the terms [tex]\( 4 \sqrt{2} \)[/tex] and [tex]\( 5 \sqrt{3} \)[/tex].
- Incorrect. We cannot combine these terms directly because their radicands are not the same.
Therefore, the best answer from the given choices is:
A. The two terms cannot be combined because the radicands are not identical, and cannot be simplified so that they are identical.
A. The two terms cannot be combined because the radicands are not identical, and cannot be simplified so that they are identical.
- This statement suggests that because [tex]\( \sqrt{2} \)[/tex] and [tex]\( \sqrt{3} \)[/tex] have different values under the radical sign (radicands), and these values cannot be changed to become the same, the terms cannot be combined.
- Correct. Since the radicands ([tex]\( 2 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( 3 \)[/tex]) are not the same, these terms cannot be combined.
B. The two terms cannot be combined because the indices are not identical.
- This statement would be relevant if we had different indices (such as [tex]\(\sqrt[3]{2}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(\sqrt{3}\)[/tex]), but in this case, both terms are square roots, so the indices are indeed the same.
- Incorrect. The indices for both terms in [tex]\( 4 \sqrt{2} - 5 \sqrt{3} \)[/tex] are the same (both are square roots).
C. The two terms cannot be combined because the resulting value of the subtraction would be negative.
- This statement is incorrect because combining terms based on whether the result is negative or positive doesn’t affect whether they can be combined or not.
- Incorrect. The possibility of a negative result does not factor into whether the terms can be combined in this algebraic context.
D. The two terms may be combined.
- This statement is suggesting that it is possible to combine the terms [tex]\( 4 \sqrt{2} \)[/tex] and [tex]\( 5 \sqrt{3} \)[/tex].
- Incorrect. We cannot combine these terms directly because their radicands are not the same.
Therefore, the best answer from the given choices is:
A. The two terms cannot be combined because the radicands are not identical, and cannot be simplified so that they are identical.
We value your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Your questions find clarity at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more dependable solutions.