Join the IDNLearn.com community and start exploring a world of knowledge today. Ask your questions and receive reliable, detailed answers from our dedicated community of experts.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The courts would use strict scrutiny as the legal standard in cases of discrimination based on race, ethnicity, national origin, or religion, requiring a compelling governmental interest and narrowly tailored measures.
Explanation:
Strict scrutiny is the legal standard that the courts would use in deciding a case involving discrimination based on race, ethnicity, national origin, or religion. Under strict scrutiny, the government needs to prove a compelling governmental interest and show that no alternative means are available to achieve the goal.
For example, in cases of affirmative action, which aims to address discrimination based on race or ethnicity, strict scrutiny is applied to assess the necessity of racial discrimination to achieve a compelling governmental interest.
Strict scrutiny sets a high bar for justifying discriminatory practices based on certain protected characteristics, emphasizing the need for a compelling reason and narrowly tailored measures.
Learn more about Legal standards for discrimination cases here:
https://brainly.com/question/28259375
We greatly appreciate every question and answer you provide. Keep engaging and finding the best solutions. This community is the perfect place to learn and grow together. IDNLearn.com is committed to providing accurate answers. Thanks for stopping by, and see you next time for more solutions.