At IDNLearn.com, find answers to your most pressing questions from experts and enthusiasts alike. Discover prompt and accurate answers from our experts, ensuring you get the information you need quickly.
Sagot :
To determine which table represents the graph of a logarithmic function with both an [tex]\( x \)[/tex]- and [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept., let's translate the provided information into a mathematical context:
A logarithmic function of the form [tex]\( y = \log_b(x) \)[/tex] has a vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex] and typically intersects the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis when [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex] because [tex]\( \log_b(1) = 0 \)[/tex]. It generally intersects the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis at [tex]\( x = b^{-y} \)[/tex].
In the given table, we have the following data:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline x & y \\ \hline 0.5 & -0.631 \\ \hline 1.5 & 0.369 \\ \hline 2.5 & 0.834 \\ \hline 3.5 & 1.146 \\ \hline 4.5 & 1.369 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
From this table, we observe:
- For [tex]\( x = 0.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = -0.631 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 1.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = 0.369 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 2.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = 0.834 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 3.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = 1.146 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 4.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = 1.369 \)[/tex]
Let's analyze these pairs:
1. The point [tex]\( (0.5, -0.631) \)[/tex] implies a negative [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-value, which is consistent with the logarithmic function, as [tex]\( \log_b(0.5) \)[/tex] is negative for any base [tex]\( b > 1 \)[/tex].
2. The point [tex]\( (1.5, 0.369) \)[/tex] suggests a positive [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-value, which indicates that for [tex]\( x > 1 \)[/tex], the function value is positive.
3. The value [tex]\( y \)[/tex] is increasing as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases, which is also characteristic of a logarithmic function when [tex]\( x > 1 \)[/tex].
Given these points, the table represents a logarithmic function, but we need to confirm if the intercepts coordinate with our bounds.
An intercept understanding:
- [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept: At [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex], we typically intersect the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis at [tex]\( y = 0 \)[/tex].
- [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-intercept: The table does not explicitly show [tex]\( x > 0 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( x \)[/tex] yielding exactly zero [tex]\( y \)[/tex].
From these, the given intercepts seem consistent with logarithmic characteristics.
Therefore, the table provided does represent the graph of a logarithmic function with both [tex]\( x \)[/tex]- and [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercepts.
A logarithmic function of the form [tex]\( y = \log_b(x) \)[/tex] has a vertical asymptote at [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex] and typically intersects the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis when [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex] because [tex]\( \log_b(1) = 0 \)[/tex]. It generally intersects the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-axis at [tex]\( x = b^{-y} \)[/tex].
In the given table, we have the following data:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline x & y \\ \hline 0.5 & -0.631 \\ \hline 1.5 & 0.369 \\ \hline 2.5 & 0.834 \\ \hline 3.5 & 1.146 \\ \hline 4.5 & 1.369 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
From this table, we observe:
- For [tex]\( x = 0.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = -0.631 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 1.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = 0.369 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 2.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = 0.834 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 3.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = 1.146 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 4.5 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = 1.369 \)[/tex]
Let's analyze these pairs:
1. The point [tex]\( (0.5, -0.631) \)[/tex] implies a negative [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-value, which is consistent with the logarithmic function, as [tex]\( \log_b(0.5) \)[/tex] is negative for any base [tex]\( b > 1 \)[/tex].
2. The point [tex]\( (1.5, 0.369) \)[/tex] suggests a positive [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-value, which indicates that for [tex]\( x > 1 \)[/tex], the function value is positive.
3. The value [tex]\( y \)[/tex] is increasing as [tex]\( x \)[/tex] increases, which is also characteristic of a logarithmic function when [tex]\( x > 1 \)[/tex].
Given these points, the table represents a logarithmic function, but we need to confirm if the intercepts coordinate with our bounds.
An intercept understanding:
- [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercept: At [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex], we typically intersect the [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-axis at [tex]\( y = 0 \)[/tex].
- [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-intercept: The table does not explicitly show [tex]\( x > 0 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( x \)[/tex] yielding exactly zero [tex]\( y \)[/tex].
From these, the given intercepts seem consistent with logarithmic characteristics.
Therefore, the table provided does represent the graph of a logarithmic function with both [tex]\( x \)[/tex]- and [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-intercepts.
We appreciate your presence here. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. This community is the perfect place to learn together. Your questions find answers at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for visiting, and come back for more accurate and reliable solutions.