Answered

Discover new knowledge and insights with IDNLearn.com's extensive Q&A database. Our community is here to provide the comprehensive and accurate answers you need to make informed decisions.

Which two statements accurately describe differences between Supreme Court justices and the top-level officials of other branches of government?

A. Supreme Court justices are appointed for life, whereas top-level officials in other branches have limited terms.
B. Supreme Court justices do not face re-election, while top-level officials in other branches may be re-elected.
C. Supreme Court justices are confirmed by the Senate, but top-level officials in other branches are not.
D. Supreme Court justices have judicial responsibilities, whereas top-level officials in other branches have legislative or executive responsibilities.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

Supreme Court Justices and top-level officials differ in appointment process and responsiveness to the popular will.


Explanation:

Supreme Court Justices and top-level officials of other branches of government differ in several key aspects:

  1. Appointment and Tenure: Supreme Court Justices are nominated by the president and approved by the Senate for lifetime appointments, providing them with independence. In contrast, officials in other branches serve limited terms or are subject to regular elections.
  2. Responsiveness to Popular Will: Justices are insulated from direct public influence, aiming for impartiality. This contrasts with elected officials in other branches who are directly accountable to the people.

Learn more about Supreme Court justices vs. top-level officials of other branches here:

https://brainly.com/question/44377516


We appreciate your contributions to this forum. Don't forget to check back for the latest answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. IDNLearn.com provides the answers you need. Thank you for visiting, and see you next time for more valuable insights.