Explore a wide range of topics and get answers from experts on IDNLearn.com. Our experts provide timely and precise responses to help you understand and solve any issue you face.
Sagot :
Let's analyze the given table and the possible values for [tex]\( R \)[/tex].
Here is the provided table rewritten for clarity:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \cline { 2 - 4 } \multicolumn{1}{c|}{} & A & B & C & \text{Total} \\ \hline D & 0.12 & 0.78 & 0.10 & 1.0 \\ \hline E & R & S & T & 1.0 \\ \hline \text{Total} & U & X & Y & 1.0 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
First, let's find the missing column totals [tex]\( U \)[/tex], [tex]\( X \)[/tex], and [tex]\( Y \)[/tex]:
- The total for column [tex]\( A \)[/tex] (denoted as [tex]\( U \)[/tex]):
[tex]\[ U = 0.12 + R \][/tex]
- The total for column [tex]\( B \)[/tex] (denoted as [tex]\( X \)[/tex]):
[tex]\[ X = 0.78 + S \][/tex]
- The total for column [tex]\( C \)[/tex] (denoted as [tex]\( Y \)[/tex]):
[tex]\[ Y = 0.10 + T \][/tex]
Given that the overall totals of each column should sum to 1, we have:
- For column [tex]\( A \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 0.12 + R = 1.0 \implies R = 1.0 - 0.12 = 0.88 \][/tex]
- For column [tex]\( B \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 0.78 + S = 1.0 \implies S = 1.0 - 0.78 = 0.22 \][/tex]
- For column [tex]\( C \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 0.10 + T = 1.0 \implies T = 1.0 - 0.10 = 0.90 \][/tex]
From this analysis, let's examine the proposed values for [tex]\( R \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( 0.09 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( 0.10 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( 0.13 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( 0.79 \)[/tex]
We need to identify which value for [tex]\( R \)[/tex] would indicate an association. Note that in conditional probability and association analysis, large discrepancies between expected and observed frequencies can indicate such associations.
Given that [tex]\( D \)[/tex] represents 78% in column [tex]\( B \)[/tex], we need a value for [tex]\( R \)[/tex] which can practically differentiate column [tex]\( A \)[/tex]. Here, a value like [tex]\( 0.79 \)[/tex] for [tex]\( R \)[/tex] would show that most values of [tex]\( E \)[/tex] are conversing significantly to column [tex]\( A \)[/tex]. It highlights a much higher discrepancy compared to the other proposed values (0.09, 0.10, and 0.13).
The value [tex]\( 0.79 \)[/tex] is much larger, indicating a much stronger association between the variables compared to other provided values which are significantly smaller.
Therefore, the value for [tex]\( R \)[/tex] that most likely indicates an association between the conditional variables is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{0.79} \][/tex]
Here is the provided table rewritten for clarity:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \cline { 2 - 4 } \multicolumn{1}{c|}{} & A & B & C & \text{Total} \\ \hline D & 0.12 & 0.78 & 0.10 & 1.0 \\ \hline E & R & S & T & 1.0 \\ \hline \text{Total} & U & X & Y & 1.0 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
First, let's find the missing column totals [tex]\( U \)[/tex], [tex]\( X \)[/tex], and [tex]\( Y \)[/tex]:
- The total for column [tex]\( A \)[/tex] (denoted as [tex]\( U \)[/tex]):
[tex]\[ U = 0.12 + R \][/tex]
- The total for column [tex]\( B \)[/tex] (denoted as [tex]\( X \)[/tex]):
[tex]\[ X = 0.78 + S \][/tex]
- The total for column [tex]\( C \)[/tex] (denoted as [tex]\( Y \)[/tex]):
[tex]\[ Y = 0.10 + T \][/tex]
Given that the overall totals of each column should sum to 1, we have:
- For column [tex]\( A \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 0.12 + R = 1.0 \implies R = 1.0 - 0.12 = 0.88 \][/tex]
- For column [tex]\( B \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 0.78 + S = 1.0 \implies S = 1.0 - 0.78 = 0.22 \][/tex]
- For column [tex]\( C \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 0.10 + T = 1.0 \implies T = 1.0 - 0.10 = 0.90 \][/tex]
From this analysis, let's examine the proposed values for [tex]\( R \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( 0.09 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( 0.10 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( 0.13 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( 0.79 \)[/tex]
We need to identify which value for [tex]\( R \)[/tex] would indicate an association. Note that in conditional probability and association analysis, large discrepancies between expected and observed frequencies can indicate such associations.
Given that [tex]\( D \)[/tex] represents 78% in column [tex]\( B \)[/tex], we need a value for [tex]\( R \)[/tex] which can practically differentiate column [tex]\( A \)[/tex]. Here, a value like [tex]\( 0.79 \)[/tex] for [tex]\( R \)[/tex] would show that most values of [tex]\( E \)[/tex] are conversing significantly to column [tex]\( A \)[/tex]. It highlights a much higher discrepancy compared to the other proposed values (0.09, 0.10, and 0.13).
The value [tex]\( 0.79 \)[/tex] is much larger, indicating a much stronger association between the variables compared to other provided values which are significantly smaller.
Therefore, the value for [tex]\( R \)[/tex] that most likely indicates an association between the conditional variables is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{0.79} \][/tex]
We value your presence here. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. This community is the perfect place to learn together. IDNLearn.com provides the best answers to your questions. Thank you for visiting, and come back soon for more helpful information.