Answered

IDNLearn.com is committed to providing high-quality answers to your questions. Get prompt and accurate answers to your questions from our community of experts who are always ready to help.

Which of the following statements about Cutter vs. Powell is true?

A. Implied terms in a contract take precedence over written ones.
B. Partial performance always leads to partial pay-outs.
C. Powell was held liable to pay Mr. Cutter's salary to Mrs. Cutter.
D. Written contract terms supersede implied terms.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

In Cutter vs. Powell, written contract terms prevail over implied terms, Mr. Powell was not liable to pay Mr. Cutter's salary to Mrs. Cutter, and in contract law, written terms generally take precedence.


Explanation:

Written contract terms supersede implied terms is the true statement regarding Cutter vs. Powell.

In the case of Cutter vs. Powell, the court held that Mr. Powell was not liable to pay Mr. Cutter's salary to Mrs. Cutter as it was not a valid claim.

Implied terms can supplement written contract terms, but written terms generally take precedence over implied ones in contract law.


Learn more about Cutter vs. Powell contract law here:

https://brainly.com/question/51380693


We value your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Your search for answers ends at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for visiting, and we look forward to helping you again soon.