Discover new perspectives and gain insights with IDNLearn.com. Our Q&A platform is designed to provide quick and accurate answers to any questions you may have.
Sagot :
To determine if the prediction of the number of owls in year 9 using the given quadratic regression model makes sense, we need to follow these steps:
1. Identify the Model: The quadratic regression equation given is [tex]\( y = -1.34x^2 + 10.75x - 11.3 \)[/tex].
2. Substitute Year into the Model: Substitute [tex]\( x = 9 \)[/tex] into the model to predict the number of owls in year 9.
[tex]\[ y = -1.34(9)^2 + 10.75(9) - 11.3 \][/tex]
3. Calculate the Predicted Number of Owls:
- First, calculate [tex]\( 9^2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 9^2 = 81 \][/tex]
- Then, multiply by the coefficient of [tex]\( x^2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ -1.34 \times 81 = -108.54 \][/tex]
- Next, multiply [tex]\( 10.75 \)[/tex] by [tex]\( 9 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 10.75 \times 9 = 96.75 \][/tex]
- Finally, add the results and subtract [tex]\( 11.3 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = -108.54 + 96.75 - 11.3 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ y = -23.09 \][/tex]
4. Interpret the Result: The predicted number of owls for year 9 is [tex]\( -23.09 \)[/tex].
5. Analyze the Prediction:
- A predicted result of [tex]\( -23.09 \)[/tex] owls is not realistic because a population cannot be negative.
- This indicates that the model's prediction for year 9 does not make sense.
6. Conclusion: Given that a negative number of owls is not possible in a realistic context, the prediction does not make sense. Therefore, the best choice among the provided options is:
C. No, because you can't have a negative number of owls.
1. Identify the Model: The quadratic regression equation given is [tex]\( y = -1.34x^2 + 10.75x - 11.3 \)[/tex].
2. Substitute Year into the Model: Substitute [tex]\( x = 9 \)[/tex] into the model to predict the number of owls in year 9.
[tex]\[ y = -1.34(9)^2 + 10.75(9) - 11.3 \][/tex]
3. Calculate the Predicted Number of Owls:
- First, calculate [tex]\( 9^2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 9^2 = 81 \][/tex]
- Then, multiply by the coefficient of [tex]\( x^2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ -1.34 \times 81 = -108.54 \][/tex]
- Next, multiply [tex]\( 10.75 \)[/tex] by [tex]\( 9 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 10.75 \times 9 = 96.75 \][/tex]
- Finally, add the results and subtract [tex]\( 11.3 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = -108.54 + 96.75 - 11.3 \][/tex]
[tex]\[ y = -23.09 \][/tex]
4. Interpret the Result: The predicted number of owls for year 9 is [tex]\( -23.09 \)[/tex].
5. Analyze the Prediction:
- A predicted result of [tex]\( -23.09 \)[/tex] owls is not realistic because a population cannot be negative.
- This indicates that the model's prediction for year 9 does not make sense.
6. Conclusion: Given that a negative number of owls is not possible in a realistic context, the prediction does not make sense. Therefore, the best choice among the provided options is:
C. No, because you can't have a negative number of owls.
Thank you for contributing to our discussion. Don't forget to check back for new answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. Discover insightful answers at IDNLearn.com. We appreciate your visit and look forward to assisting you again.