From tech troubles to travel tips, IDNLearn.com has answers to all your questions. Find accurate and detailed answers to your questions from our experienced and dedicated community members.
Sagot :
To determine the correct function that models the change between the number of days, [tex]\( t \)[/tex], and the number of orders remaining, let's analyze the situation and each given function.
### Problem Analysis
The store starts with 2,000 orders. Each day, the store owner completes one-third of the remaining orders from the previous day. That means two-thirds of the orders are completed each day, leaving one-third of the orders still remaining.
### Function Modeling
1. Initial Orders: On day 0, the number of orders is 2,000.
- [tex]\( f(0) = 2000 \)[/tex]
2. Day 1 Calculation:
- At the end of day 1, only one-third of the 2,000 orders should remain.
- Therefore, [tex]\( f(1) = 2000 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{3}\right) = 666.67 \)[/tex]
3. Day 2 Calculation:
- At the end of day 2, only one-third of the orders remaining at the end of day 1 will still be unfulfilled.
- Therefore, [tex]\( f(2) = 2000 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^2 \approx 222.22 \)[/tex]
This pattern continues, indicating that the number of orders remaining can be expressed by a geometric progression:
[tex]\[ f(t) = 2000 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^t \][/tex]
### Evaluating Function Choices
Given the following options:
- [tex]\( f(t) = 2000 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^t \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(t) = -2000 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^t \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( r(t) = 2000 \cdot 3^t \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(t) = -2000 \cdot 3t \)[/tex]
We can derive the correct option by methodically rejecting the incorrect ones:
1. [tex]\( f(t) = 2000 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^t \)[/tex]
- This correctly follows the geometric progression where each day one-third of the previous day's orders remain.
2. [tex]\( f(t) = -2000 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^t \)[/tex]
- A negative number of orders does not make sense in this context.
3. [tex]\( r(t) = 2000 \cdot 3^t \)[/tex]
- This would imply the number of orders increases exponentially, which contradicts the given problem.
4. [tex]\( f(t) = -2000 \cdot 3t \)[/tex]
- This is a linear function that gives negative values and also does not fit the progression model.
### Conclusion
The correct function that models the change between the number of days, [tex]\( t \)[/tex], and the number of orders remaining is:
[tex]\[ f(t) = 2000 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^t \][/tex]
Therefore, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[ 1 \][/tex]
### Problem Analysis
The store starts with 2,000 orders. Each day, the store owner completes one-third of the remaining orders from the previous day. That means two-thirds of the orders are completed each day, leaving one-third of the orders still remaining.
### Function Modeling
1. Initial Orders: On day 0, the number of orders is 2,000.
- [tex]\( f(0) = 2000 \)[/tex]
2. Day 1 Calculation:
- At the end of day 1, only one-third of the 2,000 orders should remain.
- Therefore, [tex]\( f(1) = 2000 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{3}\right) = 666.67 \)[/tex]
3. Day 2 Calculation:
- At the end of day 2, only one-third of the orders remaining at the end of day 1 will still be unfulfilled.
- Therefore, [tex]\( f(2) = 2000 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^2 \approx 222.22 \)[/tex]
This pattern continues, indicating that the number of orders remaining can be expressed by a geometric progression:
[tex]\[ f(t) = 2000 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^t \][/tex]
### Evaluating Function Choices
Given the following options:
- [tex]\( f(t) = 2000 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^t \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(t) = -2000 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^t \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( r(t) = 2000 \cdot 3^t \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( f(t) = -2000 \cdot 3t \)[/tex]
We can derive the correct option by methodically rejecting the incorrect ones:
1. [tex]\( f(t) = 2000 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^t \)[/tex]
- This correctly follows the geometric progression where each day one-third of the previous day's orders remain.
2. [tex]\( f(t) = -2000 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^t \)[/tex]
- A negative number of orders does not make sense in this context.
3. [tex]\( r(t) = 2000 \cdot 3^t \)[/tex]
- This would imply the number of orders increases exponentially, which contradicts the given problem.
4. [tex]\( f(t) = -2000 \cdot 3t \)[/tex]
- This is a linear function that gives negative values and also does not fit the progression model.
### Conclusion
The correct function that models the change between the number of days, [tex]\( t \)[/tex], and the number of orders remaining is:
[tex]\[ f(t) = 2000 \cdot \left(\frac{1}{3}\right)^t \][/tex]
Therefore, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[ 1 \][/tex]
We appreciate your presence here. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. This community is the perfect place to learn together. IDNLearn.com is committed to providing the best answers. Thank you for visiting, and see you next time for more solutions.