Join IDNLearn.com and start getting the answers you've been searching for. Join our community to receive prompt, thorough responses from knowledgeable experts.
Sagot :
To determine which transformation of [tex]\( f(x) \)[/tex] will produce [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex], let's analyze the given table of values.
The given values are:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline x & f(x) & g(x) \\ \hline -8 & 16 & 4 \\ \hline -4 & 4 & 1 \\ \hline 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline 4 & 4 & 1 \\ \hline 8 & 16 & 4 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
Now, let's consider each proposed transformation and evaluate whether it matches the given table of values:
1. [tex]\( g(x) = \frac{1}{4} f(x) \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = -8 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(\frac{1}{4} f(-8) = \frac{1}{4} \times 16 = 4\)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = -4 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(\frac{1}{4} f(-4) = \frac{1}{4} \times 4 = 1\)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(\frac{1}{4} f(0) = \frac{1}{4} \times 0 = 0\)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 4 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(\frac{1}{4} f(4) = \frac{1}{4} \times 4 = 1\)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 8 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(\frac{1}{4} f(8) = \frac{1}{4} \times 16 = 4\)[/tex]
We see that these values exactly match the [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] values in the table. Therefore, [tex]\( g(x) = \frac{1}{4} f(x) \)[/tex] is a valid transformation.
2. [tex]\( g(x) = f\left(\frac{1}{4} x\right) \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = -8 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( f\left(\frac{-8}{4}\right) = f(-2) \)[/tex], but [tex]\( f(-2) \)[/tex] is not provided in the table, so we cannot verify directly.
- Evaluators for other [tex]\( x \)[/tex] values would similarly work via [tex]\( f \)[/tex] at non-provided [tex]\( x \)[/tex] values; hence we cannot use this transformation from the given data.
Given the lack of transformation verification from table data, this cannot be concluded as correct.
3. [tex]\( g(x) = 4 f(x) \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = -8 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 4 f(-8) = 4 \times 16 = 64 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = -4 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 4 f(-4) = 4 \times 4 = 16 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 4 f(0) = 4 \times 0 = 0 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 4 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 4 f(4) = 4 \times 4 = 16 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 8 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 4 f(8) = 4 \times 16 = 64 \)[/tex]
These values do not match the [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] values in the table. Therefore, [tex]\( g(x) = 4 f(x) \)[/tex] is not the correct transformation.
4. [tex]\( g(x) = f(4x) \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = -8 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( f(4 \times -8) = f(-32) \)[/tex], which is not provided.
- Similarly, other [tex]\( x \)[/tex] transformations would lead to [tex]\( f \)[/tex] at non-provided values.
This cannot be validated via provided [tex]\( x \)[/tex] table data.
Given the valid matching computed in the first transformation:
The correct transformation is [tex]\( g(x) = \frac{1}{4} f(x) \)[/tex].
The given values are:
[tex]\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline x & f(x) & g(x) \\ \hline -8 & 16 & 4 \\ \hline -4 & 4 & 1 \\ \hline 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \hline 4 & 4 & 1 \\ \hline 8 & 16 & 4 \\ \hline \end{array} \][/tex]
Now, let's consider each proposed transformation and evaluate whether it matches the given table of values:
1. [tex]\( g(x) = \frac{1}{4} f(x) \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = -8 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(\frac{1}{4} f(-8) = \frac{1}{4} \times 16 = 4\)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = -4 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(\frac{1}{4} f(-4) = \frac{1}{4} \times 4 = 1\)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(\frac{1}{4} f(0) = \frac{1}{4} \times 0 = 0\)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 4 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(\frac{1}{4} f(4) = \frac{1}{4} \times 4 = 1\)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 8 \)[/tex]: [tex]\(\frac{1}{4} f(8) = \frac{1}{4} \times 16 = 4\)[/tex]
We see that these values exactly match the [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] values in the table. Therefore, [tex]\( g(x) = \frac{1}{4} f(x) \)[/tex] is a valid transformation.
2. [tex]\( g(x) = f\left(\frac{1}{4} x\right) \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = -8 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( f\left(\frac{-8}{4}\right) = f(-2) \)[/tex], but [tex]\( f(-2) \)[/tex] is not provided in the table, so we cannot verify directly.
- Evaluators for other [tex]\( x \)[/tex] values would similarly work via [tex]\( f \)[/tex] at non-provided [tex]\( x \)[/tex] values; hence we cannot use this transformation from the given data.
Given the lack of transformation verification from table data, this cannot be concluded as correct.
3. [tex]\( g(x) = 4 f(x) \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = -8 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 4 f(-8) = 4 \times 16 = 64 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = -4 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 4 f(-4) = 4 \times 4 = 16 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 4 f(0) = 4 \times 0 = 0 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 4 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 4 f(4) = 4 \times 4 = 16 \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = 8 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( 4 f(8) = 4 \times 16 = 64 \)[/tex]
These values do not match the [tex]\( g(x) \)[/tex] values in the table. Therefore, [tex]\( g(x) = 4 f(x) \)[/tex] is not the correct transformation.
4. [tex]\( g(x) = f(4x) \)[/tex]
- For [tex]\( x = -8 \)[/tex]: [tex]\( f(4 \times -8) = f(-32) \)[/tex], which is not provided.
- Similarly, other [tex]\( x \)[/tex] transformations would lead to [tex]\( f \)[/tex] at non-provided values.
This cannot be validated via provided [tex]\( x \)[/tex] table data.
Given the valid matching computed in the first transformation:
The correct transformation is [tex]\( g(x) = \frac{1}{4} f(x) \)[/tex].
We value your presence here. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. This community is the perfect place to learn together. Your search for answers ends at IDNLearn.com. Thank you for visiting, and we hope to assist you again soon.
