Get the answers you've been searching for with IDNLearn.com. Our experts are ready to provide in-depth answers and practical solutions to any questions you may have.
Sagot :
To determine which set of quantum numbers is not valid, let’s review the rules for valid quantum numbers:
1. Principal quantum number ([tex]\(n\)[/tex]): This must be a positive integer ([tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex]).
2. Azimuthal quantum number ([tex]\(l\)[/tex]): This must be a non-negative integer such that [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex].
3. Magnetic quantum number ([tex]\(m\)[/tex]): This must be an integer such that [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex].
Now, let's analyze each given set of quantum numbers to check their validity:
1. Set 1: [tex]\(n = 2, l = 1, m = 0\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 2\)[/tex] is a positive integer, so it's valid.
- [tex]\(l = 1\)[/tex] satisfies [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] because [tex]\(0 \leq 1 < 2\)[/tex], so it's valid.
- [tex]\(m = 0\)[/tex] satisfies [tex]\(-1 \leq 0 \leq 1\)[/tex] since [tex]\(l = 1\)[/tex], so it's valid.
Therefore, the set [tex]\(n = 2, l = 1, m = 0\)[/tex] is valid.
2. Set 2: [tex]\(n = 1, l = 0, m = 0\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 1\)[/tex] is a positive integer, so it's valid.
- [tex]\(l = 0\)[/tex] satisfies [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] because [tex]\(0 \leq 0 < 1\)[/tex], so it’s valid.
- [tex]\(m = 0\)[/tex] satisfies [tex]\(-0 \leq 0 \leq 0\)[/tex] since [tex]\(l = 0\)[/tex], so it’s valid.
Therefore, the set [tex]\(n = 1, l = 0, m = 0\)[/tex] is valid.
3. Set 3: [tex]\(n = 3, l = 3, m = 3\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 3\)[/tex] is a positive integer, so it's valid.
- [tex]\(l = 3\)[/tex] does not satisfy [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] because [tex]\(0 \leq 3 < 3\)[/tex] is false.
Therefore, the set [tex]\(n = 3, l = 3, m = 3\)[/tex] is not valid because [tex]\(l\)[/tex] must be less than [tex]\(n\)[/tex] but here [tex]\(l\)[/tex] equals [tex]\(n\)[/tex].
So, the invalid set of quantum numbers is:
[tex]\[ n = 3, l = 3, m = 3 \][/tex]
This is the third set from the list. Hence, the result indicates that the third set is the invalid one.
1. Principal quantum number ([tex]\(n\)[/tex]): This must be a positive integer ([tex]\(n > 0\)[/tex]).
2. Azimuthal quantum number ([tex]\(l\)[/tex]): This must be a non-negative integer such that [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex].
3. Magnetic quantum number ([tex]\(m\)[/tex]): This must be an integer such that [tex]\(-l \leq m \leq l\)[/tex].
Now, let's analyze each given set of quantum numbers to check their validity:
1. Set 1: [tex]\(n = 2, l = 1, m = 0\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 2\)[/tex] is a positive integer, so it's valid.
- [tex]\(l = 1\)[/tex] satisfies [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] because [tex]\(0 \leq 1 < 2\)[/tex], so it's valid.
- [tex]\(m = 0\)[/tex] satisfies [tex]\(-1 \leq 0 \leq 1\)[/tex] since [tex]\(l = 1\)[/tex], so it's valid.
Therefore, the set [tex]\(n = 2, l = 1, m = 0\)[/tex] is valid.
2. Set 2: [tex]\(n = 1, l = 0, m = 0\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 1\)[/tex] is a positive integer, so it's valid.
- [tex]\(l = 0\)[/tex] satisfies [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] because [tex]\(0 \leq 0 < 1\)[/tex], so it’s valid.
- [tex]\(m = 0\)[/tex] satisfies [tex]\(-0 \leq 0 \leq 0\)[/tex] since [tex]\(l = 0\)[/tex], so it’s valid.
Therefore, the set [tex]\(n = 1, l = 0, m = 0\)[/tex] is valid.
3. Set 3: [tex]\(n = 3, l = 3, m = 3\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(n = 3\)[/tex] is a positive integer, so it's valid.
- [tex]\(l = 3\)[/tex] does not satisfy [tex]\(0 \leq l < n\)[/tex] because [tex]\(0 \leq 3 < 3\)[/tex] is false.
Therefore, the set [tex]\(n = 3, l = 3, m = 3\)[/tex] is not valid because [tex]\(l\)[/tex] must be less than [tex]\(n\)[/tex] but here [tex]\(l\)[/tex] equals [tex]\(n\)[/tex].
So, the invalid set of quantum numbers is:
[tex]\[ n = 3, l = 3, m = 3 \][/tex]
This is the third set from the list. Hence, the result indicates that the third set is the invalid one.
We value your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Find clear and concise answers at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more dependable solutions.