IDNLearn.com: Your reliable source for finding expert answers. Find the answers you need quickly and accurately with help from our knowledgeable and experienced experts.
Sagot :
To find an exponential function that grows at a faster rate than the quadratic function [tex]\( y = 3x^2 \)[/tex] within the interval [tex]\( 0 < x < 3 \)[/tex], we'll compare the values of both functions at specific points within the interval.
First, let's evaluate the quadratic function [tex]\( y = 3x^2 \)[/tex] at [tex]\( x = 0, 1, 2, \)[/tex] and [tex]\( 3 \)[/tex].
For [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 3(0)^2 = 0 \][/tex]
For [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 3(1)^2 = 3 \][/tex]
For [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 3(2)^2 = 12 \][/tex]
For [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 3(3)^2 = 27 \][/tex]
So, the quadratic values at [tex]\( x = 0, 1, 2, \)[/tex] and [tex]\( 3 \)[/tex] are [tex]\( 0, 3, 12, \)[/tex] and [tex]\( 27 \)[/tex] respectively.
Now, let's evaluate the exponential function [tex]\( y = e^x \)[/tex] at the same points.
For [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = e^0 = 1.0 \][/tex]
For [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = e^1 \approx 2.718 \][/tex]
For [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = e^2 \approx 7.389 \][/tex]
For [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = e^3 \approx 20.086 \][/tex]
So, the exponential values at [tex]\( x = 0, 1, 2, \, \text{and} \, 3 \)[/tex] are approximately [tex]\( 1.0, 2.718, 7.389, \, \text{and} \, 20.086 \)[/tex] respectively.
Comparing the values of the quadratic function [tex]\( y = 3x^2 \)[/tex] and the exponential function [tex]\( y = e^x \)[/tex] for [tex]\( x \)[/tex] in the interval [tex]\( 0 < x < 3 \)[/tex]:
- At [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]:
- Quadratic: [tex]\( 3 \)[/tex]
- Exponential: [tex]\( \approx 2.718 \)[/tex]
The quadratic is slightly higher.
- At [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]:
- Quadratic: [tex]\( 12 \)[/tex]
- Exponential: [tex]\( \approx 7.389 \)[/tex]
The quadratic is higher.
- At [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex]:
- Quadratic: [tex]\( 27 \)[/tex]
- Exponential: [tex]\( \approx 20.086 \)[/tex]
The quadratic is still higher, but the exponential is catching up.
Looking closely, we can see that for [tex]\( x < 3 \)[/tex], the exponential values start lower but approach the quadratic values. Exponential functions generally have the property of surpassing polynomial functions beyond a certain point because their growth rate is faster.
Thus, the exponential function [tex]\( y = e^x \)[/tex] grows at a faster rate than the quadratic function [tex]\( y = 3x^2 \)[/tex] starting slightly after [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex], hence it is a candidate function which will surpass the quadratic growth slightly beyond [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex]. For [tex]\( x \)[/tex] between 0 and 3, while the quadratic may still be slightly higher, the exponential function [tex]\( y = e^x \)[/tex] is definitely on the verge of growing faster and surpassing it.
First, let's evaluate the quadratic function [tex]\( y = 3x^2 \)[/tex] at [tex]\( x = 0, 1, 2, \)[/tex] and [tex]\( 3 \)[/tex].
For [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 3(0)^2 = 0 \][/tex]
For [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 3(1)^2 = 3 \][/tex]
For [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 3(2)^2 = 12 \][/tex]
For [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = 3(3)^2 = 27 \][/tex]
So, the quadratic values at [tex]\( x = 0, 1, 2, \)[/tex] and [tex]\( 3 \)[/tex] are [tex]\( 0, 3, 12, \)[/tex] and [tex]\( 27 \)[/tex] respectively.
Now, let's evaluate the exponential function [tex]\( y = e^x \)[/tex] at the same points.
For [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = e^0 = 1.0 \][/tex]
For [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = e^1 \approx 2.718 \][/tex]
For [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = e^2 \approx 7.389 \][/tex]
For [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ y = e^3 \approx 20.086 \][/tex]
So, the exponential values at [tex]\( x = 0, 1, 2, \, \text{and} \, 3 \)[/tex] are approximately [tex]\( 1.0, 2.718, 7.389, \, \text{and} \, 20.086 \)[/tex] respectively.
Comparing the values of the quadratic function [tex]\( y = 3x^2 \)[/tex] and the exponential function [tex]\( y = e^x \)[/tex] for [tex]\( x \)[/tex] in the interval [tex]\( 0 < x < 3 \)[/tex]:
- At [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]:
- Quadratic: [tex]\( 3 \)[/tex]
- Exponential: [tex]\( \approx 2.718 \)[/tex]
The quadratic is slightly higher.
- At [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]:
- Quadratic: [tex]\( 12 \)[/tex]
- Exponential: [tex]\( \approx 7.389 \)[/tex]
The quadratic is higher.
- At [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex]:
- Quadratic: [tex]\( 27 \)[/tex]
- Exponential: [tex]\( \approx 20.086 \)[/tex]
The quadratic is still higher, but the exponential is catching up.
Looking closely, we can see that for [tex]\( x < 3 \)[/tex], the exponential values start lower but approach the quadratic values. Exponential functions generally have the property of surpassing polynomial functions beyond a certain point because their growth rate is faster.
Thus, the exponential function [tex]\( y = e^x \)[/tex] grows at a faster rate than the quadratic function [tex]\( y = 3x^2 \)[/tex] starting slightly after [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex], hence it is a candidate function which will surpass the quadratic growth slightly beyond [tex]\( x = 3 \)[/tex]. For [tex]\( x \)[/tex] between 0 and 3, while the quadratic may still be slightly higher, the exponential function [tex]\( y = e^x \)[/tex] is definitely on the verge of growing faster and surpassing it.
We appreciate your contributions to this forum. Don't forget to check back for the latest answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. IDNLearn.com has the answers you need. Thank you for visiting, and we look forward to helping you again soon.
