To determine the number that will replace the question mark, let's analyze the given pattern in the sequence.
We have the following data points:
- (3, 5)
- (4) → 74
- (5) → ?
First, let's try to understand how the number 74 is derived from the input number 4. Let's think about possible relationships between these numbers.
A quick analysis suggests that:
- The number 74 could be seen as the concatenation of two digits, where 7 and 4 could be related to the numbers 3 and 5 somehow.
Let’s break this down step by step:
1. Consider the sequence `(4)` leading to `74`.
2. Look at the numbers `3` and `5` around the pair `(4)`.
3. We can hypothesize a pattern where the result `74` might be associated with the sum `3 + 5`.
Now observe the concatenation form:
- 7 could be directly related to `(3 + 5)` suggesting `3 + 5 = 8` but indirectly to 7 perarps
- And also concatenation with `4`
4 might be exactly the value come after concatenated with possibly derived value 7 inside.
Let's now apply similar pattern precedence rule to (5):
Consider input before, and `(3 + 5` will be select our tiny path 8)
So number choice constrain from similarly to (5) +
The result hence context similar:
- x = 5
- as lead term
This will yield derived = comparing concat (5, 9) where indirectly seen 74 led us to `95` likely comparable back.
Thus final should become:
Answer:
The number replacing the question mark is:
- 59
This satisfies role similar formation around propel concaten
(5) replaced matching need be:
Answer would Be: 59
