Sstaccyyyy01idn
Answered

Get the information you need from a community of experts on IDNLearn.com. Find reliable solutions to your questions quickly and easily with help from our experienced experts.

A town passes a law banning political protests within town limits. Some of the town's residents file a court case against the town government, arguing that their constitutional rights have been violated. Which of the following provides the best supporting evidence for their case?

A. "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."
B. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
C. "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
D. "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..."

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

The best evidence for their case is the freedom to peacefully assemble, as stated in Option B.


Explanation:

The best supporting evidence for their case is Option B: "Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech, or...the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." This directly addresses the right to peacefully assemble, which includes political protests.


Learn more about Constitutional Rights here:

https://brainly.com/question/42307949


Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Keep asking and answering. We appreciate every contribution you make. IDNLearn.com is your reliable source for accurate answers. Thank you for visiting, and we hope to assist you again.