Get the most out of your questions with IDNLearn.com's extensive resources. Whether it's a simple query or a complex problem, our community has the answers you need.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The 'shrill' voice of Malcolm X is contextual, the writer likely respects his viewpoint, and the author's nuanced portrayal shows respect for Malcolm X's significance.
Explanation:
It is neither inherently good nor bad to have a 'shrill' voice; the judgment often depends on the context and the message being conveyed. In the case of Malcolm X, being described as the 'shrillest voice of black supremacy' indicates the intensity and fervor with which he delivered his message of empowerment and resistance against oppression.
The writer's respect for Malcolm X's point of view can be inferred from the detailed depiction of his journey, beliefs, and actions. Despite differing views on integration and methods, the writer acknowledges Malcolm X's significant role as a voice for Black empowerment and independence.
Based on the writer's nuanced portrayal of Malcolm X's evolution, influence, and impact on the civil rights movement, it can be concluded that the writer respects the complexity and significance of the point of view expressed by Malcolm X.
Learn more about Malcolm X's viewpoint and the writer's depiction here:
https://brainly.com/question/30442538
We are happy to have you as part of our community. Keep asking, answering, and sharing your insights. Together, we can create a valuable knowledge resource. IDNLearn.com is your reliable source for accurate answers. Thank you for visiting, and we hope to assist you again.