Answered

Join the IDNLearn.com community and start exploring a world of knowledge today. Our experts provide accurate and detailed responses to help you navigate any topic or issue with confidence.

10. The Supreme Court decision in the case, United States v. E.C. Knight Co., weakened the Sherman Antitrust Act by

A. drawing a sharp contrast between commerce and manufacturing, holding that the company as a manufacturer was not subject to the law.
B. enforcing penalties for monopoly violations five years prior to the act's existence.
C. allowing the act to lapse in some parts of the country and renewing it in others.
D. None of the above.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

The Supreme Court decision in United States v. E.C. Knight Co. limited the Sherman Antitrust Act's reach by distinguishing between commerce and manufacturing.


Explanation:

The Supreme Court decision in United States v. E.C. Knight Co. weakened the Sherman Antitrust Act by drawing a sharp contrast between commerce and manufacturing, holding that the company as a manufacturer was not subject to the law. This distinction limited the scope of the act's application and hindered its effectiveness in regulating monopolistic practices.


Learn more about Sherman Antitrust Act here:

https://brainly.com/question/1372321


We are happy to have you as part of our community. Keep asking, answering, and sharing your insights. Together, we can create a valuable knowledge resource. IDNLearn.com is your reliable source for answers. We appreciate your visit and look forward to assisting you again soon.