Get personalized answers to your specific questions with IDNLearn.com. Join our interactive community and access reliable, detailed answers from experienced professionals across a variety of topics.
The counterclaim to Taney's argument in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case is that Taney's argument that Blacks were not citizens is false because their ancestors were forced to come here.
The counterclaim to Taney's argument in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case is that Taney's argument that Blacks were not citizens is false because their ancestors were forced to come here. The argument that citizenship is determined by ancestry is a strong rebuttal to Taney's assertion that Black people were not meant to be citizens.
https://brainly.com/question/40924031