Find expert answers and community support for all your questions on IDNLearn.com. Join our interactive Q&A community and access a wealth of reliable answers to your most pressing questions.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The counterclaim to Taney's argument in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case is that Taney's argument that Blacks were not citizens is false because their ancestors were forced to come here.
Explanation:
The counterclaim to Taney's argument in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case is that Taney's argument that Blacks were not citizens is false because their ancestors were forced to come here. The argument that citizenship is determined by ancestry is a strong rebuttal to Taney's assertion that Black people were not meant to be citizens.
Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford case here:
https://brainly.com/question/40924031
Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Keep asking and answering. We appreciate every contribution you make. IDNLearn.com is committed to providing accurate answers. Thanks for stopping by, and see you next time for more solutions.