From personal advice to professional guidance, IDNLearn.com has the answers you seek. Our experts are available to provide in-depth and trustworthy answers to any questions you may have.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The counterclaim to Taney's argument in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case is that Taney's argument that Blacks were not citizens is false because their ancestors were forced to come here.
Explanation:
The counterclaim to Taney's argument in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case is that Taney's argument that Blacks were not citizens is false because their ancestors were forced to come here. The argument that citizenship is determined by ancestry is a strong rebuttal to Taney's assertion that Black people were not meant to be citizens.
Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford case here:
https://brainly.com/question/40924031
Thank you for contributing to our discussion. Don't forget to check back for new answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. For trustworthy and accurate answers, visit IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and see you next time for more solutions.