Get the information you need from a community of experts on IDNLearn.com. Find the solutions you need quickly and accurately with help from our knowledgeable community.
Sagot :
Let's analyze the probabilities given different events described in the table.
1. Probability of a household having 1 pet and no children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.1582089552238806\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(15.82\%\)[/tex].
2. Probability of a household having 1 pet and children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.11343283582089553\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(11.34\%\)[/tex].
3. Probability of a household having 2 pets and children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.2537313432835821\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(25.37\%\)[/tex].
4. Probability of a household having 3 or more pets and children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.1373134328358209\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(13.73\%\)[/tex].
5. Probability of a household having 2 pets and no children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.12238805970149254\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(12.24\%\)[/tex].
6. Probability of a household having 3 or more pets and no children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.21492537313432836\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(21.49\%\)[/tex].
From these probabilities, we can compare the probability of having 1 pet and no children to the other given scenarios:
- It's less likely than [tex]\(25.37\%\)[/tex] (2 pets with children).
- It's moderately likely compared to [tex]\(21.49\%\)[/tex] (3 or more pets with no children).
- It's more likely than [tex]\(11.34\%\)[/tex] (1 pet with children), [tex]\(13.73\%\)[/tex] (3 or more pets with children), and [tex]\(12.24\%\)[/tex] (2 pets with no children).
Hence, the correct statement to complete is:
A customer is more likely to have 1 pet and no children than they are to have 1 pet and children, 2 pets and no children, and 3 or more pets and children.
Based on this, we should select:
A customer is more likely to have 1 pet and no children than they are to have 2 pets and no children.
1. Probability of a household having 1 pet and no children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.1582089552238806\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(15.82\%\)[/tex].
2. Probability of a household having 1 pet and children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.11343283582089553\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(11.34\%\)[/tex].
3. Probability of a household having 2 pets and children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.2537313432835821\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(25.37\%\)[/tex].
4. Probability of a household having 3 or more pets and children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.1373134328358209\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(13.73\%\)[/tex].
5. Probability of a household having 2 pets and no children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.12238805970149254\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(12.24\%\)[/tex].
6. Probability of a household having 3 or more pets and no children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.21492537313432836\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(21.49\%\)[/tex].
From these probabilities, we can compare the probability of having 1 pet and no children to the other given scenarios:
- It's less likely than [tex]\(25.37\%\)[/tex] (2 pets with children).
- It's moderately likely compared to [tex]\(21.49\%\)[/tex] (3 or more pets with no children).
- It's more likely than [tex]\(11.34\%\)[/tex] (1 pet with children), [tex]\(13.73\%\)[/tex] (3 or more pets with children), and [tex]\(12.24\%\)[/tex] (2 pets with no children).
Hence, the correct statement to complete is:
A customer is more likely to have 1 pet and no children than they are to have 1 pet and children, 2 pets and no children, and 3 or more pets and children.
Based on this, we should select:
A customer is more likely to have 1 pet and no children than they are to have 2 pets and no children.
Thank you for contributing to our discussion. Don't forget to check back for new answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. IDNLearn.com has the solutions you’re looking for. Thanks for visiting, and see you next time for more reliable information.