IDNLearn.com helps you find the answers you need quickly and efficiently. Get the information you need from our community of experts, who provide detailed and trustworthy answers.
Sagot :
Let's analyze the probabilities given different events described in the table.
1. Probability of a household having 1 pet and no children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.1582089552238806\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(15.82\%\)[/tex].
2. Probability of a household having 1 pet and children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.11343283582089553\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(11.34\%\)[/tex].
3. Probability of a household having 2 pets and children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.2537313432835821\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(25.37\%\)[/tex].
4. Probability of a household having 3 or more pets and children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.1373134328358209\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(13.73\%\)[/tex].
5. Probability of a household having 2 pets and no children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.12238805970149254\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(12.24\%\)[/tex].
6. Probability of a household having 3 or more pets and no children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.21492537313432836\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(21.49\%\)[/tex].
From these probabilities, we can compare the probability of having 1 pet and no children to the other given scenarios:
- It's less likely than [tex]\(25.37\%\)[/tex] (2 pets with children).
- It's moderately likely compared to [tex]\(21.49\%\)[/tex] (3 or more pets with no children).
- It's more likely than [tex]\(11.34\%\)[/tex] (1 pet with children), [tex]\(13.73\%\)[/tex] (3 or more pets with children), and [tex]\(12.24\%\)[/tex] (2 pets with no children).
Hence, the correct statement to complete is:
A customer is more likely to have 1 pet and no children than they are to have 1 pet and children, 2 pets and no children, and 3 or more pets and children.
Based on this, we should select:
A customer is more likely to have 1 pet and no children than they are to have 2 pets and no children.
1. Probability of a household having 1 pet and no children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.1582089552238806\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(15.82\%\)[/tex].
2. Probability of a household having 1 pet and children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.11343283582089553\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(11.34\%\)[/tex].
3. Probability of a household having 2 pets and children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.2537313432835821\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(25.37\%\)[/tex].
4. Probability of a household having 3 or more pets and children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.1373134328358209\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(13.73\%\)[/tex].
5. Probability of a household having 2 pets and no children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.12238805970149254\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(12.24\%\)[/tex].
6. Probability of a household having 3 or more pets and no children:
The probability is [tex]\(0.21492537313432836\)[/tex] or approximately [tex]\(21.49\%\)[/tex].
From these probabilities, we can compare the probability of having 1 pet and no children to the other given scenarios:
- It's less likely than [tex]\(25.37\%\)[/tex] (2 pets with children).
- It's moderately likely compared to [tex]\(21.49\%\)[/tex] (3 or more pets with no children).
- It's more likely than [tex]\(11.34\%\)[/tex] (1 pet with children), [tex]\(13.73\%\)[/tex] (3 or more pets with children), and [tex]\(12.24\%\)[/tex] (2 pets with no children).
Hence, the correct statement to complete is:
A customer is more likely to have 1 pet and no children than they are to have 1 pet and children, 2 pets and no children, and 3 or more pets and children.
Based on this, we should select:
A customer is more likely to have 1 pet and no children than they are to have 2 pets and no children.
Your participation means a lot to us. Keep sharing information and solutions. This community grows thanks to the amazing contributions from members like you. Find precise solutions at IDNLearn.com. Thank you for trusting us with your queries, and we hope to see you again.