IDNLearn.com: Your reliable source for finding precise answers. Our platform is designed to provide reliable and thorough answers to all your questions, no matter the topic.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The Anti-Federalists opposed the 'necessary and proper clause' in the Constitution due to concerns about granting Congress excessive powers beyond what was intended, leading to conflicts over federal authority. The debate between the 'necessary and proper clause' and the Tenth Amendment has sparked ongoing disputes between the states and the national government.
Explanation:
The Anti-Federalists were against the 'necessary and proper clause' in the Constitution because they believed it granted Congress overly broad powers beyond what was intended. They feared that this clause, also known as the 'Elastic Clause,' would allow Congress to exceed its limits and encroach on individual rights.
By advocating for a bill of rights, the Anti-Federalists aimed to ensure that the exercise of power by the government, particularly Congress, was restrained within proper limits, similar to the state governments.
This debate over the 'necessary and proper clause' versus the Tenth Amendment has led to ongoing conflicts between the states and the national government over the extent of federal authority.
Learn more about Constitutional powers and limitations here:
https://brainly.com/question/39961008
Thank you for participating in our discussion. We value every contribution. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. Let's create a dynamic and informative learning environment together. IDNLearn.com is dedicated to providing accurate answers. Thank you for visiting, and see you next time for more solutions.