From science to arts, IDNLearn.com has the answers to all your questions. Find accurate and detailed answers to your questions from our experienced and dedicated community members.
Sagot :
Let's closely analyze each step that Jacob followed to identify where he might have gone wrong.
### Step by Step Analysis
#### Step 1:
Jacob rewrote the given equation:
[tex]\[ 2^x - 4 = 3^{-x} - 2 \][/tex]
as:
[tex]\[ (2^x - 4) - (3^{-x} - 2) = 0 \][/tex]
This step is algebraically correct.
#### Step 2:
Jacob evaluated the rewritten equation at the bounds [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ (2^1 - 4) - (3^{-1} - 2) \approx -0.333 \][/tex]
This value is correct because:
[tex]\[ (2 - 4) - \left(\frac{1}{3} - 2\right) = -2 - (-1.6667) = -0.3333 \][/tex]
For [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ (2^2 - 4) - (3^{-2} - 2) \approx 1.889 \][/tex]
This value, however, is incorrect. The actual evaluated value given by the solution is:
[tex]\[ (4 - 4) - \left(\frac{1}{9} - 2\right) = 0 - (-1.8889) = 1.8889 \][/tex]
Thus, Jacob's calculated value of [tex]\( 1.889 \)[/tex] at [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex] was indeed correct to 3 decimal places. Hence, there isn't an issue in step 2.
#### Step 3:
Jacob took the average of the lower and upper bounds:
[tex]\[ \frac{1 + 2}{2} = \frac{3}{2} = 1.5 \][/tex]
This calculation is also correct.
#### Step 4:
Jacob evaluated the rewritten equation at [tex]\( x = 1.5 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \left(2^{1.5} - 4\right) - \left(3^{-1.5} - 2\right) \approx 0.636 \][/tex]
This value is accurate as the given solution provides:
[tex]\[ (2^{1.5} - 4) - (3^{-1.5} - 2) \approx 0.636 \][/tex]
#### Step 5:
Jacob decided to adjust the bounds based on the midpoint evaluation. Since [tex]\( x = \frac{3}{2} \)[/tex] yielded a positive value ([tex]\( \approx 0.636 \)[/tex]), he should modify the bounds to [tex]\( [1, 1.5] \)[/tex], with the midpoint becoming the new upper bound.
### Conclusion
From the above steps, it becomes clear that all calculations performed in steps 1 through 4 were correct, and Jacob correctly identified that at [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex], the function equals approximately [tex]\( 1.889 \)[/tex]. Jacob also correctly evaluated the function at [tex]\( x = 1.5 \)[/tex].
However, if the problem states that Jacob made a mistake, it appears in adjusting the bounds based on the new information. Despite selecting the bounds correctly in step 2, since [tex]\( 1.889 \)[/tex] (at [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]) is positive and [tex]\( -0.333 \)[/tex] (at [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]) is negative, Jacob should continue ranging between these bounds more accurately.
Given that the values were accurate based on step 2, the correct bounding process in step 5 should proceed accurately without an issue. Jacob most probably didn't commit a mistake in these critical steps.
### Final Answer:
C. Jacob did not make any mistakes in the calculation process.
### Step by Step Analysis
#### Step 1:
Jacob rewrote the given equation:
[tex]\[ 2^x - 4 = 3^{-x} - 2 \][/tex]
as:
[tex]\[ (2^x - 4) - (3^{-x} - 2) = 0 \][/tex]
This step is algebraically correct.
#### Step 2:
Jacob evaluated the rewritten equation at the bounds [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ (2^1 - 4) - (3^{-1} - 2) \approx -0.333 \][/tex]
This value is correct because:
[tex]\[ (2 - 4) - \left(\frac{1}{3} - 2\right) = -2 - (-1.6667) = -0.3333 \][/tex]
For [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ (2^2 - 4) - (3^{-2} - 2) \approx 1.889 \][/tex]
This value, however, is incorrect. The actual evaluated value given by the solution is:
[tex]\[ (4 - 4) - \left(\frac{1}{9} - 2\right) = 0 - (-1.8889) = 1.8889 \][/tex]
Thus, Jacob's calculated value of [tex]\( 1.889 \)[/tex] at [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex] was indeed correct to 3 decimal places. Hence, there isn't an issue in step 2.
#### Step 3:
Jacob took the average of the lower and upper bounds:
[tex]\[ \frac{1 + 2}{2} = \frac{3}{2} = 1.5 \][/tex]
This calculation is also correct.
#### Step 4:
Jacob evaluated the rewritten equation at [tex]\( x = 1.5 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \left(2^{1.5} - 4\right) - \left(3^{-1.5} - 2\right) \approx 0.636 \][/tex]
This value is accurate as the given solution provides:
[tex]\[ (2^{1.5} - 4) - (3^{-1.5} - 2) \approx 0.636 \][/tex]
#### Step 5:
Jacob decided to adjust the bounds based on the midpoint evaluation. Since [tex]\( x = \frac{3}{2} \)[/tex] yielded a positive value ([tex]\( \approx 0.636 \)[/tex]), he should modify the bounds to [tex]\( [1, 1.5] \)[/tex], with the midpoint becoming the new upper bound.
### Conclusion
From the above steps, it becomes clear that all calculations performed in steps 1 through 4 were correct, and Jacob correctly identified that at [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex], the function equals approximately [tex]\( 1.889 \)[/tex]. Jacob also correctly evaluated the function at [tex]\( x = 1.5 \)[/tex].
However, if the problem states that Jacob made a mistake, it appears in adjusting the bounds based on the new information. Despite selecting the bounds correctly in step 2, since [tex]\( 1.889 \)[/tex] (at [tex]\( x = 2 \)[/tex]) is positive and [tex]\( -0.333 \)[/tex] (at [tex]\( x = 1 \)[/tex]) is negative, Jacob should continue ranging between these bounds more accurately.
Given that the values were accurate based on step 2, the correct bounding process in step 5 should proceed accurately without an issue. Jacob most probably didn't commit a mistake in these critical steps.
### Final Answer:
C. Jacob did not make any mistakes in the calculation process.
Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Don't hesitate to keep asking and answering. We value every contribution you make. Your search for solutions ends here at IDNLearn.com. Thank you for visiting, and come back soon for more helpful information.
