IDNLearn.com is your reliable source for expert answers and community insights. Discover comprehensive answers to your questions from our community of knowledgeable experts.
Sagot :
To determine the condition under which point [tex]\( O \)[/tex] is the midpoint of the line segment [tex]\( MN \)[/tex], we can analyze each of the given options.
1. [tex]\( ON + OM = MN \)[/tex]
- This condition states that the sum of the distances from [tex]\( O \)[/tex] to [tex]\( N \)[/tex] and from [tex]\( O \)[/tex] to [tex]\( M \)[/tex] is equal to the total length of the segment [tex]\( MN \)[/tex].
Thus:
[tex]\[ ON + OM = MN \][/tex]
While this equation is true by the definition of a line segment, it does not specifically characterize [tex]\( O \)[/tex] as the midpoint. The requirement for [tex]\( O \)[/tex] to be the midpoint is that [tex]\( ON \)[/tex] and [tex]\( OM \)[/tex] be equal, which this equation alone does not imply.
2. [tex]\( ON = OM \)[/tex]
- This condition states that the distance from [tex]\( O \)[/tex] to [tex]\( N \)[/tex] is equal to the distance from [tex]\( O \)[/tex] to [tex]\( M \)[/tex].
Thus:
[tex]\[ ON = OM \][/tex]
This equality directly implies that [tex]\( O \)[/tex] is equidistant from both [tex]\( M \)[/tex] and [tex]\( N \)[/tex]. Therefore, [tex]\( O \)[/tex] would divide [tex]\( MN \)[/tex] into two equal segments, confirming that [tex]\( O \)[/tex] is the midpoint of [tex]\( MN \)[/tex].
3. [tex]\( ON = NM \)[/tex]
- This condition states that the distance from [tex]\( O \)[/tex] to [tex]\( N \)[/tex] is equal to the distance from [tex]\( N \)[/tex] to [tex]\( M \)[/tex].
Thus:
[tex]\[ ON = NM \][/tex]
This would imply that [tex]\( N \)[/tex] is the midpoint of the segment [tex]\( OM \)[/tex], which contradicts the definition of [tex]\( O \)[/tex] being the midpoint of [tex]\( MN \)[/tex]. Therefore, this is incorrect.
4. [tex]\( OM = NM \)[/tex]
- This condition states that the distance from [tex]\( O \)[/tex] to [tex]\( M \)[/tex] is equal to the distance from [tex]\( N \)[/tex] to [tex]\( M \)[/tex].
Thus:
[tex]\[ OM = NM \][/tex]
This would imply that [tex]\( M \)[/tex] is the midpoint, not [tex]\( O \)[/tex]. Therefore, this condition does not show that [tex]\( O \)[/tex] is the midpoint of [tex]\( MN \)[/tex].
Therefore, the correct condition that must hold true for [tex]\( O \)[/tex] to be the midpoint of [tex]\( MN \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ ON = OM \][/tex]
Hence, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{2} \][/tex]
1. [tex]\( ON + OM = MN \)[/tex]
- This condition states that the sum of the distances from [tex]\( O \)[/tex] to [tex]\( N \)[/tex] and from [tex]\( O \)[/tex] to [tex]\( M \)[/tex] is equal to the total length of the segment [tex]\( MN \)[/tex].
Thus:
[tex]\[ ON + OM = MN \][/tex]
While this equation is true by the definition of a line segment, it does not specifically characterize [tex]\( O \)[/tex] as the midpoint. The requirement for [tex]\( O \)[/tex] to be the midpoint is that [tex]\( ON \)[/tex] and [tex]\( OM \)[/tex] be equal, which this equation alone does not imply.
2. [tex]\( ON = OM \)[/tex]
- This condition states that the distance from [tex]\( O \)[/tex] to [tex]\( N \)[/tex] is equal to the distance from [tex]\( O \)[/tex] to [tex]\( M \)[/tex].
Thus:
[tex]\[ ON = OM \][/tex]
This equality directly implies that [tex]\( O \)[/tex] is equidistant from both [tex]\( M \)[/tex] and [tex]\( N \)[/tex]. Therefore, [tex]\( O \)[/tex] would divide [tex]\( MN \)[/tex] into two equal segments, confirming that [tex]\( O \)[/tex] is the midpoint of [tex]\( MN \)[/tex].
3. [tex]\( ON = NM \)[/tex]
- This condition states that the distance from [tex]\( O \)[/tex] to [tex]\( N \)[/tex] is equal to the distance from [tex]\( N \)[/tex] to [tex]\( M \)[/tex].
Thus:
[tex]\[ ON = NM \][/tex]
This would imply that [tex]\( N \)[/tex] is the midpoint of the segment [tex]\( OM \)[/tex], which contradicts the definition of [tex]\( O \)[/tex] being the midpoint of [tex]\( MN \)[/tex]. Therefore, this is incorrect.
4. [tex]\( OM = NM \)[/tex]
- This condition states that the distance from [tex]\( O \)[/tex] to [tex]\( M \)[/tex] is equal to the distance from [tex]\( N \)[/tex] to [tex]\( M \)[/tex].
Thus:
[tex]\[ OM = NM \][/tex]
This would imply that [tex]\( M \)[/tex] is the midpoint, not [tex]\( O \)[/tex]. Therefore, this condition does not show that [tex]\( O \)[/tex] is the midpoint of [tex]\( MN \)[/tex].
Therefore, the correct condition that must hold true for [tex]\( O \)[/tex] to be the midpoint of [tex]\( MN \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ ON = OM \][/tex]
Hence, the correct answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{2} \][/tex]
Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Don't hesitate to keep asking and answering. We value every contribution you make. Thank you for choosing IDNLearn.com. We’re here to provide reliable answers, so please visit us again for more solutions.