IDNLearn.com offers a comprehensive solution for finding accurate answers quickly. Find accurate and detailed answers to your questions from our experienced and dedicated community members.
Sagot :
Let's break down the given expression [tex]\(10 - \{3 \times 2) + 2 \times [2 - (9 \div 22)]\}=0\)[/tex] step by step.
### Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Evaluate the division inside the innermost brackets:
[tex]\[ \frac{9}{22} \approx 0.4091 \][/tex]
2. Evaluate the expression inside the square brackets next:
[tex]\[ 2 - \frac{9}{22} \approx 2 - 0.4091 = 1.5909 \][/tex]
3. Evaluate the multiplication inside the square brackets:
[tex]\[ 2 \times (2 - \frac{9}{22}) \approx 2 \times 1.5909 = 3.1818 \][/tex]
4. Evaluate the multiplication outside the curly-braces:
[tex]\[ 3 \times 2 = 6 \][/tex]
5. Put it all together and evaluate the remaining expression:
[tex]\[ 10 - 6 + 3.1818 = 4 + 3.1818 = 7.1818 \][/tex]
Now, let’s see if the final expression equals 0:
[tex]\[ 10 - 6 + 3.1818 = 7.1818 \neq 0 \][/tex]
So, after evaluating each part step by step, we find that the expression equals approximately 7.1818, which is not equal to 0. The initial assertion that [tex]\(10-\{3 \times 2)+2 \times[2-(9 \div 22]\}=0\)[/tex] seems to be incorrect. The correct evaluation of the expression yields [tex]\(7.1818\)[/tex], not [tex]\(0\)[/tex].
### Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Evaluate the division inside the innermost brackets:
[tex]\[ \frac{9}{22} \approx 0.4091 \][/tex]
2. Evaluate the expression inside the square brackets next:
[tex]\[ 2 - \frac{9}{22} \approx 2 - 0.4091 = 1.5909 \][/tex]
3. Evaluate the multiplication inside the square brackets:
[tex]\[ 2 \times (2 - \frac{9}{22}) \approx 2 \times 1.5909 = 3.1818 \][/tex]
4. Evaluate the multiplication outside the curly-braces:
[tex]\[ 3 \times 2 = 6 \][/tex]
5. Put it all together and evaluate the remaining expression:
[tex]\[ 10 - 6 + 3.1818 = 4 + 3.1818 = 7.1818 \][/tex]
Now, let’s see if the final expression equals 0:
[tex]\[ 10 - 6 + 3.1818 = 7.1818 \neq 0 \][/tex]
So, after evaluating each part step by step, we find that the expression equals approximately 7.1818, which is not equal to 0. The initial assertion that [tex]\(10-\{3 \times 2)+2 \times[2-(9 \div 22]\}=0\)[/tex] seems to be incorrect. The correct evaluation of the expression yields [tex]\(7.1818\)[/tex], not [tex]\(0\)[/tex].
Thank you for contributing to our discussion. Don't forget to check back for new answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. For dependable answers, trust IDNLearn.com. Thank you for visiting, and we look forward to helping you again soon.