IDNLearn.com provides a user-friendly platform for finding answers to your questions. Discover detailed and accurate answers to your questions from our knowledgeable and dedicated community members.
Sagot :
Sure, let's go through each part of this problem step-by-step, incorporating the information you provided.
### a) Hypothesis Test
#### Null and Alternative Hypotheses:
For the hypothesis test, we need to determine whether the proportion of students who believe that freedom of the press is secure is the same in 2016 and 2017.
- Null Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_0\)[/tex]): The proportion in 2016 is equal to the proportion in 2017.
[tex]$H_0: p_1 = p_2$[/tex]
- Alternative Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_a\)[/tex]): The proportion in 2016 is different from the proportion in 2017.
[tex]$H_a: p_1 \neq p_2$[/tex]
So, the correct option is:
D. [tex]\(H_0: p_1 = p_2\)[/tex], [tex]\(H_a: p_1 \neq p_2\)[/tex].
#### Test Statistic:
The test statistic for this hypothesis test is the z-score, which has been provided.
- Test Statistic:
[tex]$ z = -10.53 $[/tex]
#### p-value:
The p-value is used to determine the significance of our test statistic.
- p-value:
[tex]$ p\text{-value} = 0 $[/tex]
#### Decision:
We compare the p-value with the significance level ([tex]\(\alpha = 0.01\)[/tex]) to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis.
- Since the p-value (which is very close to zero) is less than [tex]\( \alpha = 0.01 \)[/tex], we reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the 2016 proportion is different from the 2017 proportion.
Filling the part:
Since the p-value is less than the significance level of [tex]\( \alpha = 0.01 \)[/tex], reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the 2016 proportion is different from the 2017 proportion.
### b) Confidence Interval
We are asked to construct a 98% confidence interval for the difference in proportions of college students who felt freedom of the press was secure in 2016 and 2017.
- The result from the Python code provides this:
- Confidence Interval: [tex]\((-0.133, -0.088)\)[/tex]
So, the 98% confidence interval is:
[tex]$ (-0.133, -0.088) $[/tex]
### How does the confidence interval support the hypothesis test conclusion?
The confidence interval [tex]\((-0.133, -0.088)\)[/tex] does not include 0, which means there is a significant difference in proportions. Since 0 is not within this interval, we reject the null hypothesis at the 1% significance level, supporting our hypothesis test conclusion that the 2016 proportion is different from the 2017 proportion.
### a) Hypothesis Test
#### Null and Alternative Hypotheses:
For the hypothesis test, we need to determine whether the proportion of students who believe that freedom of the press is secure is the same in 2016 and 2017.
- Null Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_0\)[/tex]): The proportion in 2016 is equal to the proportion in 2017.
[tex]$H_0: p_1 = p_2$[/tex]
- Alternative Hypothesis ([tex]\(H_a\)[/tex]): The proportion in 2016 is different from the proportion in 2017.
[tex]$H_a: p_1 \neq p_2$[/tex]
So, the correct option is:
D. [tex]\(H_0: p_1 = p_2\)[/tex], [tex]\(H_a: p_1 \neq p_2\)[/tex].
#### Test Statistic:
The test statistic for this hypothesis test is the z-score, which has been provided.
- Test Statistic:
[tex]$ z = -10.53 $[/tex]
#### p-value:
The p-value is used to determine the significance of our test statistic.
- p-value:
[tex]$ p\text{-value} = 0 $[/tex]
#### Decision:
We compare the p-value with the significance level ([tex]\(\alpha = 0.01\)[/tex]) to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis.
- Since the p-value (which is very close to zero) is less than [tex]\( \alpha = 0.01 \)[/tex], we reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the 2016 proportion is different from the 2017 proportion.
Filling the part:
Since the p-value is less than the significance level of [tex]\( \alpha = 0.01 \)[/tex], reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the 2016 proportion is different from the 2017 proportion.
### b) Confidence Interval
We are asked to construct a 98% confidence interval for the difference in proportions of college students who felt freedom of the press was secure in 2016 and 2017.
- The result from the Python code provides this:
- Confidence Interval: [tex]\((-0.133, -0.088)\)[/tex]
So, the 98% confidence interval is:
[tex]$ (-0.133, -0.088) $[/tex]
### How does the confidence interval support the hypothesis test conclusion?
The confidence interval [tex]\((-0.133, -0.088)\)[/tex] does not include 0, which means there is a significant difference in proportions. Since 0 is not within this interval, we reject the null hypothesis at the 1% significance level, supporting our hypothesis test conclusion that the 2016 proportion is different from the 2017 proportion.
Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Don't hesitate to keep asking and answering. We value every contribution you make. Thank you for choosing IDNLearn.com for your queries. We’re here to provide accurate answers, so visit us again soon.