From simple queries to complex problems, IDNLearn.com provides reliable answers. Ask any question and get a detailed, reliable answer from our community of experts.
Sagot :
Let's break down and solve each part of the problem step-by-step using the model provided, [tex]\( y = 2.9 \sqrt{x} + 36 \)[/tex].
### a. Head Circumference at Birth
Given [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
1. Substitute [tex]\( x \)[/tex] into the equation:
[tex]\[ y = 2.9 \sqrt{0} + 36 \][/tex]
2. Simplify the equation:
[tex]\[ y = 2.9 \times 0 + 36 = 36 \][/tex]
3. Therefore, the head circumference at birth ([tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]) is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{36.0 \text{ cm}} \][/tex]
### b. Head Circumference at 9 Months
Given [tex]\( x = 9 \)[/tex]:
1. Substitute [tex]\( x \)[/tex] into the equation:
[tex]\[ y = 2.9 \sqrt{9} + 36 \][/tex]
2. Simplify the equation:
[tex]\[ y = 2.9 \times 3 + 36 = 8.7 + 36 = 44.7 \][/tex]
3. Therefore, the head circumference at 9 months ([tex]\( x = 9 \)[/tex]) is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{44.7 \text{ cm}} \][/tex]
### c. Head Circumference at 14 Months
Given [tex]\( x = 14 \)[/tex]:
1. Substitute [tex]\( x \)[/tex] into the equation:
[tex]\[ y = 2.9 \sqrt{14} + 36 \][/tex]
2. Simplify the equation:
[tex]\[ y \approx 2.9 \times 3.74 + 36 \approx 10.846 + 36 = 46.9 \][/tex]
3. Therefore, the head circumference at 14 months ([tex]\( x = 14 \)[/tex]) is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{46.9 \text{ cm}} \][/tex]
### d. Validating the Model
To compare the model with empirical data on your graphing calculator:
1. Plot the equation [tex]\( y = 2.9 \sqrt{x} + 36 \)[/tex] on a graphing calculator.
2. Locate the points for [tex]\( x = 0, 9, \)[/tex] and [tex]\( 14 \)[/tex] months on the graph.
3. Verify if the calculated values from this model match the points on the graph.
From the calculations:
- At [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], the graph should show [tex]\( (0, 36) \)[/tex].
- At [tex]\( x = 9 \)[/tex], the graph should show [tex]\( (9, 44.7) \)[/tex].
- At [tex]\( x = 14 \)[/tex], the graph should show [tex]\( (14, 46.9) \)[/tex].
By comparing the points on the graph with the model-derived values, you can determine if the model provides an accurate representation of the head circumference over time. If the points match closely, then this is a good model. Given that models in science and mathematics often have small deviations from actual measurements, slight differences are expected. However, if the model-derived values are close to the plotted points, then this model is likely reliable.
#### Conclusion
The values obtained from the model at birth, 9 months, and 14 months (36.0 cm, 44.7 cm, and 46.9 cm respectively) align well with our equation and demonstrate a consistent trend that can be useful for estimating head circumferences in infants.
Therefore, we conclude the answers:
10a [tex]\( \boxed{36.0 \text{ cm}} \)[/tex]
10b [tex]\( \boxed{44.7 \text{ cm}} \)[/tex]
10c [tex]\( \boxed{46.9 \text{ cm}} \)[/tex]
### a. Head Circumference at Birth
Given [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]:
1. Substitute [tex]\( x \)[/tex] into the equation:
[tex]\[ y = 2.9 \sqrt{0} + 36 \][/tex]
2. Simplify the equation:
[tex]\[ y = 2.9 \times 0 + 36 = 36 \][/tex]
3. Therefore, the head circumference at birth ([tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex]) is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{36.0 \text{ cm}} \][/tex]
### b. Head Circumference at 9 Months
Given [tex]\( x = 9 \)[/tex]:
1. Substitute [tex]\( x \)[/tex] into the equation:
[tex]\[ y = 2.9 \sqrt{9} + 36 \][/tex]
2. Simplify the equation:
[tex]\[ y = 2.9 \times 3 + 36 = 8.7 + 36 = 44.7 \][/tex]
3. Therefore, the head circumference at 9 months ([tex]\( x = 9 \)[/tex]) is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{44.7 \text{ cm}} \][/tex]
### c. Head Circumference at 14 Months
Given [tex]\( x = 14 \)[/tex]:
1. Substitute [tex]\( x \)[/tex] into the equation:
[tex]\[ y = 2.9 \sqrt{14} + 36 \][/tex]
2. Simplify the equation:
[tex]\[ y \approx 2.9 \times 3.74 + 36 \approx 10.846 + 36 = 46.9 \][/tex]
3. Therefore, the head circumference at 14 months ([tex]\( x = 14 \)[/tex]) is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{46.9 \text{ cm}} \][/tex]
### d. Validating the Model
To compare the model with empirical data on your graphing calculator:
1. Plot the equation [tex]\( y = 2.9 \sqrt{x} + 36 \)[/tex] on a graphing calculator.
2. Locate the points for [tex]\( x = 0, 9, \)[/tex] and [tex]\( 14 \)[/tex] months on the graph.
3. Verify if the calculated values from this model match the points on the graph.
From the calculations:
- At [tex]\( x = 0 \)[/tex], the graph should show [tex]\( (0, 36) \)[/tex].
- At [tex]\( x = 9 \)[/tex], the graph should show [tex]\( (9, 44.7) \)[/tex].
- At [tex]\( x = 14 \)[/tex], the graph should show [tex]\( (14, 46.9) \)[/tex].
By comparing the points on the graph with the model-derived values, you can determine if the model provides an accurate representation of the head circumference over time. If the points match closely, then this is a good model. Given that models in science and mathematics often have small deviations from actual measurements, slight differences are expected. However, if the model-derived values are close to the plotted points, then this model is likely reliable.
#### Conclusion
The values obtained from the model at birth, 9 months, and 14 months (36.0 cm, 44.7 cm, and 46.9 cm respectively) align well with our equation and demonstrate a consistent trend that can be useful for estimating head circumferences in infants.
Therefore, we conclude the answers:
10a [tex]\( \boxed{36.0 \text{ cm}} \)[/tex]
10b [tex]\( \boxed{44.7 \text{ cm}} \)[/tex]
10c [tex]\( \boxed{46.9 \text{ cm}} \)[/tex]
We value your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Thank you for choosing IDNLearn.com for your queries. We’re committed to providing accurate answers, so visit us again soon.
