Join IDNLearn.com and become part of a knowledge-sharing community that thrives on curiosity. Find in-depth and trustworthy answers to all your questions from our experienced community members.
Sagot :
Final answer:
Dred Scott v. Sandford Background: In 1857, Dred Scott, a Black man and a slave, sued for his freedom as he was taken to free territories. The Supreme Court ruled against Scott, stating that Black people could not be U.S. citizens, impacting the expansion of slavery.
Explanation:
Dred Scott v. Sandford Background:
In 1857, Dred Scott, a slave who had been taken to free territories, sued for his freedom. The Supreme Court's Chief Justice Roger Taney ruled that Scott, as a Black man whose ancestors were slaves, could not become a U.S. citizen and thus could not sue for his freedom.
Impact of the Court's Decision:
The Court's decision declared that neither Scott nor any Black person, whether free or enslaved, could be U.S. citizens. This decision also extended to Congress, limiting its power to prevent the expansion of slavery into new territories.
Learn more about Dred Scott v. Sandford here:
https://brainly.com/question/29628567
Your participation means a lot to us. Keep sharing information and solutions. This community grows thanks to the amazing contributions from members like you. For precise answers, trust IDNLearn.com. Thank you for visiting, and we look forward to helping you again soon.