Find trusted answers to your questions with the help of IDNLearn.com's knowledgeable community. Find the answers you need quickly and accurately with help from our knowledgeable and dedicated community members.
Sagot :
To determine the distance of closest approach of an α-particle to the nucleus of a copper atom, we generally approach this problem by considering the conservation of energy and the electrostatic force of repulsion between the positively charged α-particle and the copper nucleus. Here’s a step-by-step explanation:
1. Identify Given Variables:
- Speed of the α-particle: [tex]\( V \)[/tex]
- Mass of the α-particle: [tex]\( m_\alpha \)[/tex]
- Charge of the α-particle: [tex]\( 2e \)[/tex] (since an α-particle has 2 protons)
- Atomic number of copper: [tex]\( Z = 29 \)[/tex]
- Charge of copper nucleus: [tex]\( 29e \)[/tex] (since copper nucleus has 29 protons)
2. Initial Kinetic Energy:
The initial kinetic energy [tex]\( K \)[/tex] of the α-particle is given by:
[tex]\[ K = \frac{1}{2} m_\alpha V^2 \][/tex]
3. Electrostatic Potential Energy at Closest Approach:
At the distance of closest approach, all the kinetic energy will be converted into electrostatic potential energy [tex]\( U \)[/tex]. The expression for the electrostatic potential energy between two point charges [tex]\( q_1 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q_2 \)[/tex] separated by a distance [tex]\( d \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ U = \frac{q_1 q_2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 d} \][/tex]
Here, [tex]\( q_1 = 2e \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q_2 = 29e \)[/tex].
4. Set Up Energy Conservation Equation:
At distance [tex]\( d \)[/tex] (the closest approach):
[tex]\[ \frac{1}{2} m_\alpha V^2 = \frac{(2e)(29e)}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 d} \][/tex]
5. Solve for [tex]\( d \)[/tex]:
Rearrange the equation to solve for [tex]\( d \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ d = \frac{(2e)(29e)}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 \left( \frac{1}{2} m_\alpha V^2 \right)} \][/tex]
Simplify the expression:
[tex]\[ d = \frac{2 \cdot 29 \cdot e^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 \cdot \frac{1}{2} m_\alpha V^2} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ d = \frac{58 \cdot e^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 \cdot \frac{1}{2} m_\alpha V^2} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ d = \frac{58 \cdot e^2}{2 \pi \epsilon_0 \cdot m_\alpha V^2} \][/tex]
6. Conclusion:
Therefore, the distance of closest approach [tex]\( d \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ d = \frac{58 \cdot e^2}{2 \pi \epsilon_0 \cdot m_\alpha V^2} \][/tex]
In this specific case, given the complexity involving numerous physical constants and the unspecified values of [tex]\( V \)[/tex], [tex]\( m_\alpha \)[/tex], and [tex]\( e \)[/tex], the calculation concludes that more information would be required to provide a definitive numerical answer. Thus, the distance can't be determined exactly without those specifics.
1. Identify Given Variables:
- Speed of the α-particle: [tex]\( V \)[/tex]
- Mass of the α-particle: [tex]\( m_\alpha \)[/tex]
- Charge of the α-particle: [tex]\( 2e \)[/tex] (since an α-particle has 2 protons)
- Atomic number of copper: [tex]\( Z = 29 \)[/tex]
- Charge of copper nucleus: [tex]\( 29e \)[/tex] (since copper nucleus has 29 protons)
2. Initial Kinetic Energy:
The initial kinetic energy [tex]\( K \)[/tex] of the α-particle is given by:
[tex]\[ K = \frac{1}{2} m_\alpha V^2 \][/tex]
3. Electrostatic Potential Energy at Closest Approach:
At the distance of closest approach, all the kinetic energy will be converted into electrostatic potential energy [tex]\( U \)[/tex]. The expression for the electrostatic potential energy between two point charges [tex]\( q_1 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q_2 \)[/tex] separated by a distance [tex]\( d \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ U = \frac{q_1 q_2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 d} \][/tex]
Here, [tex]\( q_1 = 2e \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q_2 = 29e \)[/tex].
4. Set Up Energy Conservation Equation:
At distance [tex]\( d \)[/tex] (the closest approach):
[tex]\[ \frac{1}{2} m_\alpha V^2 = \frac{(2e)(29e)}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 d} \][/tex]
5. Solve for [tex]\( d \)[/tex]:
Rearrange the equation to solve for [tex]\( d \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ d = \frac{(2e)(29e)}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 \left( \frac{1}{2} m_\alpha V^2 \right)} \][/tex]
Simplify the expression:
[tex]\[ d = \frac{2 \cdot 29 \cdot e^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 \cdot \frac{1}{2} m_\alpha V^2} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ d = \frac{58 \cdot e^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 \cdot \frac{1}{2} m_\alpha V^2} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ d = \frac{58 \cdot e^2}{2 \pi \epsilon_0 \cdot m_\alpha V^2} \][/tex]
6. Conclusion:
Therefore, the distance of closest approach [tex]\( d \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ d = \frac{58 \cdot e^2}{2 \pi \epsilon_0 \cdot m_\alpha V^2} \][/tex]
In this specific case, given the complexity involving numerous physical constants and the unspecified values of [tex]\( V \)[/tex], [tex]\( m_\alpha \)[/tex], and [tex]\( e \)[/tex], the calculation concludes that more information would be required to provide a definitive numerical answer. Thus, the distance can't be determined exactly without those specifics.
Thank you for contributing to our discussion. Don't forget to check back for new answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. IDNLearn.com is your source for precise answers. Thank you for visiting, and we look forward to helping you again soon.
