IDNLearn.com makes it easy to find accurate answers to your questions. Whether it's a simple query or a complex problem, our experts have the answers you need.
Sagot :
Alright, let's tackle this problem step by step.
First, we'll define the problem clearly:
- We are given the average rates of return (AOR) for different portfolios over a certain period.
- Our task is to determine the weighted mean of the rates of return (ROR) for each portfolio.
Here is the table presented:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline AOR & Portfolio 1 & Portfolio 2 & Portfolio 3 \\ \hline 7.3 & 81,150 & 8,500 & 1,100 \\ \hline 100 & 51,800 & 52,500 & 8,525 \\ \hline -6.7 & 81,405 & 250 & 825 \\ \hline 20.4 & 81,065 & 81,200 & 5,400 \\ \hline 270 & 81,450 & 511,800 & 12,225 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
### Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Calculate the total value for each portfolio:
- Sum of the values in Portfolio 1:
[tex]\[ 81,150 + 51,800 + 81,405 + 81,065 + 81,450 = 376,870 \][/tex]
- Sum of the values in Portfolio 2:
[tex]\[ 8,500 + 52,500 + 250 + 81,200 + 511,800 = 654,250 \][/tex]
- Sum of the values in Portfolio 3:
[tex]\[ 1,100 + 8,525 + 825 + 5,400 + 12,225 = 28,075 \][/tex]
2. Calculate the weighted mean for each portfolio:
- For Portfolio 1:
[tex]\[ \text{Weighted Mean Portfolio 1} = \frac{(7.3 \times 81,150) + (100 \times 51,800) + (-6.7 \times 81,405) + (20.4 \times 81,065) + (270 \times 81,450)}{376,870} \][/tex]
This results in:
[tex]\[ 76.6105221959827 \][/tex]
- For Portfolio 2:
[tex]\[ \text{Weighted Mean Portfolio 2} = \frac{(7.3 \times 8,500) + (100 \times 52,500) + (-6.7 \times 250) + (20.4 \times 81,200) + (270 \times 511,800)}{654,250} \][/tex]
This results in:
[tex]\[ 221.86145204432557 \][/tex]
- For Portfolio 3:
[tex]\[ \text{Weighted Mean Portfolio 3} = \frac{(7.3 \times 1,100) + (100 \times 8,525) + (-6.7 \times 825) + (20.4 \times 5,400) + (270 \times 12,225)}{28,075} \][/tex]
This results in:
[tex]\[ 151.94701691896705 \][/tex]
3. Determine and compare the overall performance of the portfolios:
- The weighted means we have computed are as follows:
- Portfolio 1: 76.6105221959827
- Portfolio 2: 221.86145204432557
- Portfolio 3: 151.94701691896705
4. Sort the portfolios from worst to best based on their weighted means:
- Lower weighted mean indicates poorer performance, while a higher weighted mean indicates better performance.
- Sorting the portfolios in ascending order of their weighted means:
[tex]\[ \text{Portfolio 1 (76.61)}, \text{Portfolio 3 (151.95)}, \text{Portfolio 2 (221.86)} \][/tex]
Thus, the correct order from worst to best is:
[tex]\[ \text{Portfolio 1, Portfolio 3, Portfolio 2} \][/tex]
So, the correct list that shows a comparison of the overall performance of the portfolios, from worst to best, is:
[tex]\[ \text{Portfolio 1, Portfolio 3, Portfolio 2} \][/tex]
First, we'll define the problem clearly:
- We are given the average rates of return (AOR) for different portfolios over a certain period.
- Our task is to determine the weighted mean of the rates of return (ROR) for each portfolio.
Here is the table presented:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline AOR & Portfolio 1 & Portfolio 2 & Portfolio 3 \\ \hline 7.3 & 81,150 & 8,500 & 1,100 \\ \hline 100 & 51,800 & 52,500 & 8,525 \\ \hline -6.7 & 81,405 & 250 & 825 \\ \hline 20.4 & 81,065 & 81,200 & 5,400 \\ \hline 270 & 81,450 & 511,800 & 12,225 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
### Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Calculate the total value for each portfolio:
- Sum of the values in Portfolio 1:
[tex]\[ 81,150 + 51,800 + 81,405 + 81,065 + 81,450 = 376,870 \][/tex]
- Sum of the values in Portfolio 2:
[tex]\[ 8,500 + 52,500 + 250 + 81,200 + 511,800 = 654,250 \][/tex]
- Sum of the values in Portfolio 3:
[tex]\[ 1,100 + 8,525 + 825 + 5,400 + 12,225 = 28,075 \][/tex]
2. Calculate the weighted mean for each portfolio:
- For Portfolio 1:
[tex]\[ \text{Weighted Mean Portfolio 1} = \frac{(7.3 \times 81,150) + (100 \times 51,800) + (-6.7 \times 81,405) + (20.4 \times 81,065) + (270 \times 81,450)}{376,870} \][/tex]
This results in:
[tex]\[ 76.6105221959827 \][/tex]
- For Portfolio 2:
[tex]\[ \text{Weighted Mean Portfolio 2} = \frac{(7.3 \times 8,500) + (100 \times 52,500) + (-6.7 \times 250) + (20.4 \times 81,200) + (270 \times 511,800)}{654,250} \][/tex]
This results in:
[tex]\[ 221.86145204432557 \][/tex]
- For Portfolio 3:
[tex]\[ \text{Weighted Mean Portfolio 3} = \frac{(7.3 \times 1,100) + (100 \times 8,525) + (-6.7 \times 825) + (20.4 \times 5,400) + (270 \times 12,225)}{28,075} \][/tex]
This results in:
[tex]\[ 151.94701691896705 \][/tex]
3. Determine and compare the overall performance of the portfolios:
- The weighted means we have computed are as follows:
- Portfolio 1: 76.6105221959827
- Portfolio 2: 221.86145204432557
- Portfolio 3: 151.94701691896705
4. Sort the portfolios from worst to best based on their weighted means:
- Lower weighted mean indicates poorer performance, while a higher weighted mean indicates better performance.
- Sorting the portfolios in ascending order of their weighted means:
[tex]\[ \text{Portfolio 1 (76.61)}, \text{Portfolio 3 (151.95)}, \text{Portfolio 2 (221.86)} \][/tex]
Thus, the correct order from worst to best is:
[tex]\[ \text{Portfolio 1, Portfolio 3, Portfolio 2} \][/tex]
So, the correct list that shows a comparison of the overall performance of the portfolios, from worst to best, is:
[tex]\[ \text{Portfolio 1, Portfolio 3, Portfolio 2} \][/tex]
We appreciate your contributions to this forum. Don't forget to check back for the latest answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. Your search for answers ends at IDNLearn.com. Thank you for visiting, and we hope to assist you again soon.
