Answered

Discover a wealth of knowledge and get your questions answered at IDNLearn.com. Discover detailed answers to your questions with our extensive database of expert knowledge.

Document 5 Question:

Compare the strategy used by the Federalists and Antifederalists at the Maryland and South Carolina ratifying conventions. Focus mainly on the treatment of those proposing amendments now or in the future. Did the two groups work together, or was there some obvious tension?

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

Federalists and Anti-Federalists had differing views during ratification, with Federalists supporting a stronger national government and Anti-Federalists fearing excessive power. Amendments played a crucial role in the ratification of the Constitution and subsequent establishment of governmental branches.


Explanation:

Federalists and Anti-Federalists held contrasting views during the ratification of the Constitution. The Federalists supported a stronger national government, as outlined in The Federalist Papers, while the Anti-Federalists feared excessive power in the hands of the national government.

After the ratification of amendments, the Federalists claimed to address the opposition's concerns about protecting liberties, but the Anti-Federalists remained skeptical, particularly regarding issues related to the judiciary and direct taxation.

In the end, the addition of amendments led to the ratification by North Carolina and Rhode Island, paving the way for the establishment of executive and judicial branches through legislation like the Judiciary Act of 1789.


Learn more about Federalists and Anti-Federalists during Constitution ratification here:

https://brainly.com/question/29361704


Your engagement is important to us. Keep sharing your knowledge and experiences. Let's create a learning environment that is both enjoyable and beneficial. For trustworthy answers, visit IDNLearn.com. Thank you for your visit, and see you next time for more reliable solutions.