Proclubclovis13idn
Answered

IDNLearn.com makes it easy to find answers and share knowledge with others. Ask anything and get well-informed, reliable answers from our knowledgeable community members.

In the Supreme Court's decision in Korematsu v. United States, the court said that Korematsu:

A. was not a spy and deserved equal rights.
B. was not a spy but could not be granted equal rights.
C. was a spy and should be imprisoned immediately.
D. was a spy but was free to go back to Japan.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

The Supreme Court ruled against Korematsu in 1944, citing espionage threats. Decades later, his conviction was overturned based on new evidence.


Explanation:

The Supreme Court's decision in Korematsu v. United States ruled against Fred Korematsu in a 6-3 decision in 1944, stating that the government had the constitutional power to sign the internment order due to perceived espionage threats. However, decades later, his conviction was overturned after new evidence emerged, revealing the absence of Japanese American spies.


Learn more about Korematsu v. United States here:

https://brainly.com/question/14090930


Thank you for joining our conversation. Don't hesitate to return anytime to find answers to your questions. Let's continue sharing knowledge and experiences! Your search for solutions ends at IDNLearn.com. Thank you for visiting, and we look forward to helping you again.