Proclubclovis13idn
Answered

IDNLearn.com: Your one-stop destination for finding reliable answers. Discover thorough and trustworthy answers from our community of knowledgeable professionals, tailored to meet your specific needs.

In the Supreme Court's decision in Korematsu v. United States, the court said that Korematsu:

A. was not a spy and deserved equal rights.
B. was not a spy but could not be granted equal rights.
C. was a spy and should be imprisoned immediately.
D. was a spy but was free to go back to Japan.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

The Supreme Court ruled against Korematsu in 1944, citing espionage threats. Decades later, his conviction was overturned based on new evidence.


Explanation:

The Supreme Court's decision in Korematsu v. United States ruled against Fred Korematsu in a 6-3 decision in 1944, stating that the government had the constitutional power to sign the internment order due to perceived espionage threats. However, decades later, his conviction was overturned after new evidence emerged, revealing the absence of Japanese American spies.


Learn more about Korematsu v. United States here:

https://brainly.com/question/14090930


Thank you for contributing to our discussion. Don't forget to check back for new answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. IDNLearn.com is dedicated to providing accurate answers. Thank you for visiting, and see you next time for more solutions.