Proclubclovis13idn
Answered

Solve your doubts and expand your knowledge with IDNLearn.com's extensive Q&A database. Our experts provide timely and precise responses to help you understand and solve any issue you face.

In the Supreme Court's decision in Korematsu v. United States, the court said that Korematsu:

A. was not a spy and deserved equal rights.
B. was not a spy but could not be granted equal rights.
C. was a spy and should be imprisoned immediately.
D. was a spy but was free to go back to Japan.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

The Supreme Court ruled against Korematsu in 1944, citing espionage threats. Decades later, his conviction was overturned based on new evidence.


Explanation:

The Supreme Court's decision in Korematsu v. United States ruled against Fred Korematsu in a 6-3 decision in 1944, stating that the government had the constitutional power to sign the internment order due to perceived espionage threats. However, decades later, his conviction was overturned after new evidence emerged, revealing the absence of Japanese American spies.


Learn more about Korematsu v. United States here:

https://brainly.com/question/14090930


We appreciate every question and answer you provide. Keep engaging and finding the best solutions. This community is the perfect place to learn and grow together. Your questions deserve accurate answers. Thank you for visiting IDNLearn.com, and see you again for more solutions.