Get expert insights and community-driven knowledge on IDNLearn.com. Ask anything and receive comprehensive, well-informed responses from our dedicated team of experts.
Sagot :
To determine whether the expression [tex]\( x^3 \cdot x^3 \cdot x^3 \)[/tex] is equivalent to [tex]\( x^3 \cdot 3^3 \)[/tex], we need to analyze and simplify both expressions carefully.
### Simplifying [tex]\( x^3 \cdot x^3 \cdot x^3 \)[/tex]
First, let's simplify [tex]\( x^3 \cdot x^3 \cdot x^3 \)[/tex]. This is a product of the same base ([tex]\(x\)[/tex]) raised to the power of 3 multiple times.
Using the properties of exponents, specifically the product of powers property which states [tex]\( a^m \cdot a^n = a^{m+n} \)[/tex], we can combine the exponents:
[tex]\[ x^3 \cdot x^3 \cdot x^3 = x^{3+3+3} = x^9 \][/tex]
Therefore, the simplified form of [tex]\( x^3 \cdot x^3 \cdot x^3 \)[/tex] is [tex]\( x^9 \)[/tex].
### Analyzing [tex]\( x^3 \cdot 3^3 \)[/tex]
Now, let's look at [tex]\( x^3 \cdot 3^3 \)[/tex]. This expression involves two different bases, [tex]\(x\)[/tex] and [tex]\(3\)[/tex], both raised to the power of 3. Since the bases are different, we cannot combine the terms using exponent rules. Thus, [tex]\( x^3 \cdot 3^3 \)[/tex] cannot be simplified further and remains as it is.
### Comparing the Expressions
Let's now compare the simplified form of the first expression with the second expression:
- The simplified form of [tex]\( x^3 \cdot x^3 \cdot x^3 \)[/tex] is [tex]\( x^9 \)[/tex].
- The second expression [tex]\( x^3 \cdot 3^3 \)[/tex] remains [tex]\( x^3 \cdot 3^3 \)[/tex] because the bases are different.
Since [tex]\( x^9 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( x^3 \cdot 3^3 \)[/tex] are not the same, it is clear that:
[tex]\[ x^3 \cdot x^3 \cdot x^3 \neq x^3 \cdot 3^3 \][/tex]
### Conclusion
The expression [tex]\( x^3 \cdot x^3 \cdot x^3 \)[/tex] is not equivalent to [tex]\( x^3 \cdot 3^3 \)[/tex]. The former simplifies to [tex]\( x^9 \)[/tex], while the latter cannot be simplified further and remains as [tex]\( x^3 \cdot 3^3 \)[/tex]. The difference in bases and the resultant forms make the two expressions distinct.
### Simplifying [tex]\( x^3 \cdot x^3 \cdot x^3 \)[/tex]
First, let's simplify [tex]\( x^3 \cdot x^3 \cdot x^3 \)[/tex]. This is a product of the same base ([tex]\(x\)[/tex]) raised to the power of 3 multiple times.
Using the properties of exponents, specifically the product of powers property which states [tex]\( a^m \cdot a^n = a^{m+n} \)[/tex], we can combine the exponents:
[tex]\[ x^3 \cdot x^3 \cdot x^3 = x^{3+3+3} = x^9 \][/tex]
Therefore, the simplified form of [tex]\( x^3 \cdot x^3 \cdot x^3 \)[/tex] is [tex]\( x^9 \)[/tex].
### Analyzing [tex]\( x^3 \cdot 3^3 \)[/tex]
Now, let's look at [tex]\( x^3 \cdot 3^3 \)[/tex]. This expression involves two different bases, [tex]\(x\)[/tex] and [tex]\(3\)[/tex], both raised to the power of 3. Since the bases are different, we cannot combine the terms using exponent rules. Thus, [tex]\( x^3 \cdot 3^3 \)[/tex] cannot be simplified further and remains as it is.
### Comparing the Expressions
Let's now compare the simplified form of the first expression with the second expression:
- The simplified form of [tex]\( x^3 \cdot x^3 \cdot x^3 \)[/tex] is [tex]\( x^9 \)[/tex].
- The second expression [tex]\( x^3 \cdot 3^3 \)[/tex] remains [tex]\( x^3 \cdot 3^3 \)[/tex] because the bases are different.
Since [tex]\( x^9 \)[/tex] and [tex]\( x^3 \cdot 3^3 \)[/tex] are not the same, it is clear that:
[tex]\[ x^3 \cdot x^3 \cdot x^3 \neq x^3 \cdot 3^3 \][/tex]
### Conclusion
The expression [tex]\( x^3 \cdot x^3 \cdot x^3 \)[/tex] is not equivalent to [tex]\( x^3 \cdot 3^3 \)[/tex]. The former simplifies to [tex]\( x^9 \)[/tex], while the latter cannot be simplified further and remains as [tex]\( x^3 \cdot 3^3 \)[/tex]. The difference in bases and the resultant forms make the two expressions distinct.
We appreciate your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Find the answers you need at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back soon for more valuable insights.