IDNLearn.com provides a collaborative environment for finding and sharing answers. Ask your questions and receive reliable, detailed answers from our dedicated community of experts.
Sagot :
To determine which statement is logically equivalent to the conditional statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex], let's analyze the given options step-by-step and recall some fundamental concepts of logic.
1. Original Statement: [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]
- This reads as "if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] then [tex]\( q \)[/tex]."
2. Negation ([tex]\(\sim\)[/tex]):
- The negation of a statement [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is [tex]\(\sim p\)[/tex], meaning "not [tex]\( p \)[/tex]."
3. Contrapositive:
- The contrapositive of the statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\(\sim q \rightarrow \sim p\)[/tex]. This reads as "if not [tex]\( q \)[/tex] then not [tex]\( p \)[/tex]."
- It is well-known that a conditional statement is logically equivalent to its contrapositive. Thus, [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is logically equivalent to [tex]\(\sim q \rightarrow \sim p\)[/tex].
Now, let's examine all the given options in relation to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]:
1. Option 1: [tex]\(\sim p \rightarrow \sim q\)[/tex]
- This reads as "if not [tex]\( p \)[/tex] then not [tex]\( q \)[/tex]."
- This is NOT logically equivalent to the original statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
2. Option 2: [tex]\(\sim q \rightarrow \sim p\)[/tex]
- This reads as "if not [tex]\( q \)[/tex] then not [tex]\( p \)[/tex]."
- As established earlier, this is the contrapositive of the original statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] and is logically equivalent to it.
3. Option 3: [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex]
- This reads as "if [tex]\( q \)[/tex] then [tex]\( p \)[/tex]."
- This is the converse of the original statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] and is NOT logically equivalent to it.
4. Option 4: [tex]\( p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex]
- This reads as "if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] then not [tex]\( q \)[/tex]."
- This is simply another conditional statement and is NOT logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
Therefore, based on the logical analysis above, the statement [tex]\( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p \)[/tex] is the one that is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]. Hence, the correct choice is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\sim q \rightarrow \sim p} \][/tex]
This corresponds to option 2.
1. Original Statement: [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]
- This reads as "if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] then [tex]\( q \)[/tex]."
2. Negation ([tex]\(\sim\)[/tex]):
- The negation of a statement [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is [tex]\(\sim p\)[/tex], meaning "not [tex]\( p \)[/tex]."
3. Contrapositive:
- The contrapositive of the statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\(\sim q \rightarrow \sim p\)[/tex]. This reads as "if not [tex]\( q \)[/tex] then not [tex]\( p \)[/tex]."
- It is well-known that a conditional statement is logically equivalent to its contrapositive. Thus, [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is logically equivalent to [tex]\(\sim q \rightarrow \sim p\)[/tex].
Now, let's examine all the given options in relation to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]:
1. Option 1: [tex]\(\sim p \rightarrow \sim q\)[/tex]
- This reads as "if not [tex]\( p \)[/tex] then not [tex]\( q \)[/tex]."
- This is NOT logically equivalent to the original statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
2. Option 2: [tex]\(\sim q \rightarrow \sim p\)[/tex]
- This reads as "if not [tex]\( q \)[/tex] then not [tex]\( p \)[/tex]."
- As established earlier, this is the contrapositive of the original statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] and is logically equivalent to it.
3. Option 3: [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex]
- This reads as "if [tex]\( q \)[/tex] then [tex]\( p \)[/tex]."
- This is the converse of the original statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] and is NOT logically equivalent to it.
4. Option 4: [tex]\( p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex]
- This reads as "if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] then not [tex]\( q \)[/tex]."
- This is simply another conditional statement and is NOT logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
Therefore, based on the logical analysis above, the statement [tex]\( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p \)[/tex] is the one that is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]. Hence, the correct choice is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\sim q \rightarrow \sim p} \][/tex]
This corresponds to option 2.
We appreciate your contributions to this forum. Don't forget to check back for the latest answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. IDNLearn.com provides the best answers to your questions. Thank you for visiting, and come back soon for more helpful information.