IDNLearn.com is your go-to resource for finding precise and accurate answers. Discover the information you need from our experienced professionals who provide accurate and reliable answers to all your questions.
Sagot :
To determine which statement is logically equivalent to the conditional statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex], let's analyze the given options step-by-step and recall some fundamental concepts of logic.
1. Original Statement: [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]
- This reads as "if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] then [tex]\( q \)[/tex]."
2. Negation ([tex]\(\sim\)[/tex]):
- The negation of a statement [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is [tex]\(\sim p\)[/tex], meaning "not [tex]\( p \)[/tex]."
3. Contrapositive:
- The contrapositive of the statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\(\sim q \rightarrow \sim p\)[/tex]. This reads as "if not [tex]\( q \)[/tex] then not [tex]\( p \)[/tex]."
- It is well-known that a conditional statement is logically equivalent to its contrapositive. Thus, [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is logically equivalent to [tex]\(\sim q \rightarrow \sim p\)[/tex].
Now, let's examine all the given options in relation to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]:
1. Option 1: [tex]\(\sim p \rightarrow \sim q\)[/tex]
- This reads as "if not [tex]\( p \)[/tex] then not [tex]\( q \)[/tex]."
- This is NOT logically equivalent to the original statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
2. Option 2: [tex]\(\sim q \rightarrow \sim p\)[/tex]
- This reads as "if not [tex]\( q \)[/tex] then not [tex]\( p \)[/tex]."
- As established earlier, this is the contrapositive of the original statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] and is logically equivalent to it.
3. Option 3: [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex]
- This reads as "if [tex]\( q \)[/tex] then [tex]\( p \)[/tex]."
- This is the converse of the original statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] and is NOT logically equivalent to it.
4. Option 4: [tex]\( p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex]
- This reads as "if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] then not [tex]\( q \)[/tex]."
- This is simply another conditional statement and is NOT logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
Therefore, based on the logical analysis above, the statement [tex]\( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p \)[/tex] is the one that is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]. Hence, the correct choice is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\sim q \rightarrow \sim p} \][/tex]
This corresponds to option 2.
1. Original Statement: [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]
- This reads as "if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] then [tex]\( q \)[/tex]."
2. Negation ([tex]\(\sim\)[/tex]):
- The negation of a statement [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is [tex]\(\sim p\)[/tex], meaning "not [tex]\( p \)[/tex]."
3. Contrapositive:
- The contrapositive of the statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\(\sim q \rightarrow \sim p\)[/tex]. This reads as "if not [tex]\( q \)[/tex] then not [tex]\( p \)[/tex]."
- It is well-known that a conditional statement is logically equivalent to its contrapositive. Thus, [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is logically equivalent to [tex]\(\sim q \rightarrow \sim p\)[/tex].
Now, let's examine all the given options in relation to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]:
1. Option 1: [tex]\(\sim p \rightarrow \sim q\)[/tex]
- This reads as "if not [tex]\( p \)[/tex] then not [tex]\( q \)[/tex]."
- This is NOT logically equivalent to the original statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
2. Option 2: [tex]\(\sim q \rightarrow \sim p\)[/tex]
- This reads as "if not [tex]\( q \)[/tex] then not [tex]\( p \)[/tex]."
- As established earlier, this is the contrapositive of the original statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] and is logically equivalent to it.
3. Option 3: [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex]
- This reads as "if [tex]\( q \)[/tex] then [tex]\( p \)[/tex]."
- This is the converse of the original statement [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] and is NOT logically equivalent to it.
4. Option 4: [tex]\( p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex]
- This reads as "if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] then not [tex]\( q \)[/tex]."
- This is simply another conditional statement and is NOT logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
Therefore, based on the logical analysis above, the statement [tex]\( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p \)[/tex] is the one that is logically equivalent to [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]. Hence, the correct choice is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{\sim q \rightarrow \sim p} \][/tex]
This corresponds to option 2.
Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Keep asking and answering. We appreciate every contribution you make. Thank you for trusting IDNLearn.com. We’re dedicated to providing accurate answers, so visit us again for more solutions.