IDNLearn.com: Your one-stop destination for finding reliable answers. Ask your questions and receive comprehensive and trustworthy answers from our experienced community of professionals.
Sagot :
To determine which relation is a function of [tex]\( x \)[/tex], we need to check that each [tex]\( x \)[/tex] value maps to exactly one [tex]\( y \)[/tex] value. In other words, a function cannot have the same [tex]\( x \)[/tex] value mapping to different [tex]\( y \)[/tex] values.
Let's examine each relation in turn:
### Relation 1:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline -1 & 7 \\ \hline 2 & -9 \\ \hline 2 & 8 \\ \hline 3 & -4 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Here, the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-value 2 maps to both -9 and 8. This violates the rule that each [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-value must map to exactly one [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-value. Therefore, this relation is not a function.
### Relation 2:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline -8 & -9 \\ \hline -8 & 2 \\ \hline 1 & -9 \\ \hline 1 & 2 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Here, the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-value -8 maps to both -9 and 2, and the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-value 1 maps to both -9 and 2. Therefore, this relation is not a function.
### Relation 3:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline -5 & 1 \\ \hline -5 & 7 \\ \hline -5 & -9 \\ \hline -5 & 2 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Here, the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-value -5 maps to multiple [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-values (1, 7, -9, 2). Therefore, this relation is not a function.
### Relation 4:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline -3 & -1 \\ \hline -2 & 5 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
In this table, the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-values -3 and -2 each map to exactly one unique [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-value (-1 and 5, respectively). This confirms that each [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-value has a unique [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-value.
Since Relation 4 fulfills the requirement for a function, it is the relation that is a function of [tex]\( x \)[/tex].
Therefore, the answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{4} \][/tex]
Let's examine each relation in turn:
### Relation 1:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline -1 & 7 \\ \hline 2 & -9 \\ \hline 2 & 8 \\ \hline 3 & -4 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Here, the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-value 2 maps to both -9 and 8. This violates the rule that each [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-value must map to exactly one [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-value. Therefore, this relation is not a function.
### Relation 2:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline -8 & -9 \\ \hline -8 & 2 \\ \hline 1 & -9 \\ \hline 1 & 2 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Here, the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-value -8 maps to both -9 and 2, and the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-value 1 maps to both -9 and 2. Therefore, this relation is not a function.
### Relation 3:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline -5 & 1 \\ \hline -5 & 7 \\ \hline -5 & -9 \\ \hline -5 & 2 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
Here, the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-value -5 maps to multiple [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-values (1, 7, -9, 2). Therefore, this relation is not a function.
### Relation 4:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline -3 & -1 \\ \hline -2 & 5 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
In this table, the [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-values -3 and -2 each map to exactly one unique [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-value (-1 and 5, respectively). This confirms that each [tex]\( x \)[/tex]-value has a unique [tex]\( y \)[/tex]-value.
Since Relation 4 fulfills the requirement for a function, it is the relation that is a function of [tex]\( x \)[/tex].
Therefore, the answer is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{4} \][/tex]
We value your presence here. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. This community is the perfect place to learn together. Discover the answers you need at IDNLearn.com. Thank you for visiting, and we hope to see you again for more solutions.