IDNLearn.com offers a user-friendly platform for finding and sharing knowledge. Discover the reliable solutions you need with help from our comprehensive and accurate Q&A platform.
Sagot :
To match the given equation [tex]$y - 53.75 = 3.25(x - 15)$[/tex], we need to analyze each scenario by converting them into a form that can fit into the linear equation representation. Let's break down each scenario step by step.
### Scenario 1:
A manufacturer sells widgets for [tex]$3.25 each. They charge a flat shipping rate on all orders. An order of 15 widgets costs $[/tex]53.75.
1. Let the number of widgets be [tex]\( x \)[/tex] and the total cost be [tex]\( y \)[/tex].
2. The cost of widgets would be [tex]$3.25$[/tex] each, so the cost for [tex]\( x \)[/tex] widgets is [tex]\( 3.25x \)[/tex].
3. There's a flat shipping rate (let's call it [tex]\( r \)[/tex]). So, the total cost [tex]\( y \)[/tex] is given by:
[tex]\[ y = 3.25x + r \][/tex]
4. We know that when [tex]\( x = 15 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = 53.75 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 53.75 = 3.25 \times 15 + r \][/tex]
5. Calculate:
[tex]\[ 53.75 = 48.75 + r \][/tex]
6. Solve for [tex]\( r \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ r = 53.75 - 48.75 = 5 \][/tex]
7. Thus, the equation becomes:
[tex]\[ y = 3.25x + 5 \][/tex]
This matches the given equation when rearranged: [tex]\( y - 53.75 = 3.25(x - 15) \)[/tex].
### Scenario 2:
A manufacturer sells widgets. They charge a flat shipping rate of [tex]$3.25 on all orders. An order of 15 widgets costs $[/tex]53.75.
1. There is a set flat shipping rate of [tex]$3.25, so we include this in the final cost. 2. Denote the price per widget as \( p \). The total cost \( y \) for \( x \) widgets then becomes: \[ y = px + 3.25 \] 3. Given \( x = 15 \), \( y = 53.75 \): \[ 53.75 = p \times 15 + 3.25 \] 4. Rearrange and solve for \( p \): \[ 53.75 - 3.25 = p \times 15 \] \[ 50.50 = p \times 15 \] \[ p \approx 3.37 \] 5. Therefore, the equation would be approximated to: \[ y \approx 3.37x + 3.25 \] This does not match the given equation \( y - 53.75 = 3.25(x - 15) \). ### Scenario 3: A manufacturer sells widgets for $[/tex]15 each. They charge a flat shipping rate of [tex]$3.25 on all orders. An order costs $[/tex]53.75.
1. Using the price per widget of [tex]$15: \[ y = 15x + 3.25 \] 2. Given \( x = 1 \) (only one widget price can reach the total cost $[/tex]53.75 due to high price per widget of [tex]$15): \[ 15 \times 1 + 3.25 = 18.25, \] which is far from $[/tex]53.75. Hence, this scenario does not fit.
### Conclusion:
The scenario that correctly matches the equation [tex]$y - 53.75 = 3.25(x - 15)$[/tex] is:
Scenario 1: A manufacturer sells widgets for [tex]$3.25 each. They charge a flat shipping rate on all orders. An order of 15 widgets costs $[/tex]53.75.
### Scenario 1:
A manufacturer sells widgets for [tex]$3.25 each. They charge a flat shipping rate on all orders. An order of 15 widgets costs $[/tex]53.75.
1. Let the number of widgets be [tex]\( x \)[/tex] and the total cost be [tex]\( y \)[/tex].
2. The cost of widgets would be [tex]$3.25$[/tex] each, so the cost for [tex]\( x \)[/tex] widgets is [tex]\( 3.25x \)[/tex].
3. There's a flat shipping rate (let's call it [tex]\( r \)[/tex]). So, the total cost [tex]\( y \)[/tex] is given by:
[tex]\[ y = 3.25x + r \][/tex]
4. We know that when [tex]\( x = 15 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = 53.75 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 53.75 = 3.25 \times 15 + r \][/tex]
5. Calculate:
[tex]\[ 53.75 = 48.75 + r \][/tex]
6. Solve for [tex]\( r \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ r = 53.75 - 48.75 = 5 \][/tex]
7. Thus, the equation becomes:
[tex]\[ y = 3.25x + 5 \][/tex]
This matches the given equation when rearranged: [tex]\( y - 53.75 = 3.25(x - 15) \)[/tex].
### Scenario 2:
A manufacturer sells widgets. They charge a flat shipping rate of [tex]$3.25 on all orders. An order of 15 widgets costs $[/tex]53.75.
1. There is a set flat shipping rate of [tex]$3.25, so we include this in the final cost. 2. Denote the price per widget as \( p \). The total cost \( y \) for \( x \) widgets then becomes: \[ y = px + 3.25 \] 3. Given \( x = 15 \), \( y = 53.75 \): \[ 53.75 = p \times 15 + 3.25 \] 4. Rearrange and solve for \( p \): \[ 53.75 - 3.25 = p \times 15 \] \[ 50.50 = p \times 15 \] \[ p \approx 3.37 \] 5. Therefore, the equation would be approximated to: \[ y \approx 3.37x + 3.25 \] This does not match the given equation \( y - 53.75 = 3.25(x - 15) \). ### Scenario 3: A manufacturer sells widgets for $[/tex]15 each. They charge a flat shipping rate of [tex]$3.25 on all orders. An order costs $[/tex]53.75.
1. Using the price per widget of [tex]$15: \[ y = 15x + 3.25 \] 2. Given \( x = 1 \) (only one widget price can reach the total cost $[/tex]53.75 due to high price per widget of [tex]$15): \[ 15 \times 1 + 3.25 = 18.25, \] which is far from $[/tex]53.75. Hence, this scenario does not fit.
### Conclusion:
The scenario that correctly matches the equation [tex]$y - 53.75 = 3.25(x - 15)$[/tex] is:
Scenario 1: A manufacturer sells widgets for [tex]$3.25 each. They charge a flat shipping rate on all orders. An order of 15 widgets costs $[/tex]53.75.
Thank you for being part of this discussion. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Thank you for choosing IDNLearn.com for your queries. We’re committed to providing accurate answers, so visit us again soon.