Get the most out of your questions with the extensive resources available on IDNLearn.com. Ask your questions and receive comprehensive and trustworthy answers from our experienced community of professionals.

The equation [tex]$y-53.75=3.25(x-15)$[/tex] represents the linear relationship between the cost of an order of widgets and the number of widgets ordered.

Choose the scenario that matches the equation.

A. A manufacturer sells widgets for [tex][tex]$\$[/tex] 3.25$[/tex] each. They charge a flat shipping rate on all orders. An order of 15 widgets costs [tex]$\$ 53.75$[/tex].

B. A manufacturer sells widgets. They charge a flat shipping rate of [tex][tex]$\$[/tex] 3.25$[/tex] on all orders. An order of 15 widgets costs [tex]$\$ 53.75$[/tex].

C. A manufacturer sells widgets for [tex][tex]$\$[/tex] 15$[/tex] each. They charge a flat shipping rate of [tex]$\$ 3.25$[/tex] on all orders. An order costs [tex][tex]$\$[/tex] 53.75$[/tex].


Sagot :

To match the given equation [tex]$y - 53.75 = 3.25(x - 15)$[/tex], we need to analyze each scenario by converting them into a form that can fit into the linear equation representation. Let's break down each scenario step by step.

### Scenario 1:
A manufacturer sells widgets for [tex]$3.25 each. They charge a flat shipping rate on all orders. An order of 15 widgets costs $[/tex]53.75.

1. Let the number of widgets be [tex]\( x \)[/tex] and the total cost be [tex]\( y \)[/tex].
2. The cost of widgets would be [tex]$3.25$[/tex] each, so the cost for [tex]\( x \)[/tex] widgets is [tex]\( 3.25x \)[/tex].
3. There's a flat shipping rate (let's call it [tex]\( r \)[/tex]). So, the total cost [tex]\( y \)[/tex] is given by:
[tex]\[ y = 3.25x + r \][/tex]
4. We know that when [tex]\( x = 15 \)[/tex], [tex]\( y = 53.75 \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ 53.75 = 3.25 \times 15 + r \][/tex]
5. Calculate:
[tex]\[ 53.75 = 48.75 + r \][/tex]
6. Solve for [tex]\( r \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ r = 53.75 - 48.75 = 5 \][/tex]
7. Thus, the equation becomes:
[tex]\[ y = 3.25x + 5 \][/tex]
This matches the given equation when rearranged: [tex]\( y - 53.75 = 3.25(x - 15) \)[/tex].

### Scenario 2:
A manufacturer sells widgets. They charge a flat shipping rate of [tex]$3.25 on all orders. An order of 15 widgets costs $[/tex]53.75.

1. There is a set flat shipping rate of [tex]$3.25, so we include this in the final cost. 2. Denote the price per widget as \( p \). The total cost \( y \) for \( x \) widgets then becomes: \[ y = px + 3.25 \] 3. Given \( x = 15 \), \( y = 53.75 \): \[ 53.75 = p \times 15 + 3.25 \] 4. Rearrange and solve for \( p \): \[ 53.75 - 3.25 = p \times 15 \] \[ 50.50 = p \times 15 \] \[ p \approx 3.37 \] 5. Therefore, the equation would be approximated to: \[ y \approx 3.37x + 3.25 \] This does not match the given equation \( y - 53.75 = 3.25(x - 15) \). ### Scenario 3: A manufacturer sells widgets for $[/tex]15 each. They charge a flat shipping rate of [tex]$3.25 on all orders. An order costs $[/tex]53.75.

1. Using the price per widget of [tex]$15: \[ y = 15x + 3.25 \] 2. Given \( x = 1 \) (only one widget price can reach the total cost $[/tex]53.75 due to high price per widget of [tex]$15): \[ 15 \times 1 + 3.25 = 18.25, \] which is far from $[/tex]53.75. Hence, this scenario does not fit.

### Conclusion:
The scenario that correctly matches the equation [tex]$y - 53.75 = 3.25(x - 15)$[/tex] is:

Scenario 1: A manufacturer sells widgets for [tex]$3.25 each. They charge a flat shipping rate on all orders. An order of 15 widgets costs $[/tex]53.75.