Answered

IDNLearn.com: Your reliable source for finding expert answers. Join our Q&A platform to get accurate and thorough answers to all your pressing questions.

Select the correct answer.

Molly and Lynn both set aside money weekly for their savings. Molly already has [tex]$\$[/tex]650[tex]$ set aside and adds $[/tex]\[tex]$35$[/tex] each week. Lynn already has [tex]$\$[/tex]825[tex]$ set aside but adds only $[/tex]\[tex]$15$[/tex] each week. Which inequality could they use to determine how many weeks, [tex]$w$[/tex], it will take for Molly's savings to exceed Lynn's savings?

A. [tex]$650 + 35w \ \textless \ 825 + 15w$[/tex]

B. [tex]$650 + 35w \ \textgreater \ 825 + 15w$[/tex]

C. [tex]$650w + 35 \ \textless \ 825w + 15$[/tex]

D. [tex]$650v + 35 \ \textgreater \ 825w + 15$[/tex]

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn
To determine the number of weeks [tex]\( w \)[/tex] it will take for Molly's savings to exceed Lynn's savings, we need to create an inequality that compares their savings over time.

First, let's understand how each person's savings accumulate:
- Molly starts with \[tex]$650 and adds \$[/tex]35 every week. Therefore, her total savings after [tex]\( w \)[/tex] weeks can be represented by the expression [tex]\( 650 + 35w \)[/tex].
- Lynn starts with \[tex]$825 and adds \$[/tex]15 every week. Therefore, her total savings after [tex]\( w \)[/tex] weeks can be represented by the expression [tex]\( 825 + 15w \)[/tex].

We want to find the point at which Molly's savings exceed Lynn's savings. Therefore, we set up the inequality:

[tex]\[ 650 + 35w > 825 + 15w \][/tex]

This inequality represents the relationship between their savings.

So, the correct answer is:
B. [tex]\( 650 + 35w > 825 + 15w \)[/tex]
We greatly appreciate every question and answer you provide. Keep engaging and finding the best solutions. This community is the perfect place to learn and grow together. Find clear answers at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more reliable solutions.