For all your questions, big or small, IDNLearn.com has the answers you need. Discover comprehensive answers to your questions from our community of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
Let's analyze the given statements step-by-step and apply definitions of logical statements.
Given:
- [tex]\( p \)[/tex]: A number is negative
- [tex]\( q \)[/tex]: The additive inverse is positive
The original statement (implication) is [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (a number is negative), then [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive).
We need to find the corresponding logical variations and assess which, among the provided statements, hold true.
1. Inverse of the Original Statement:
- The inverse of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \sim p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( \sim p \)[/tex]: A number is not negative (non-negative or positive or zero)
- [tex]\( \sim q \)[/tex]: The additive inverse is not positive (non-positive or negative or zero)
- Therefore, the inverse statement is: If a number is not negative, then its additive inverse is not positive.
- Formally, [tex]\( \sim p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex].
2. Converse of the Original Statement:
- The converse of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive), then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (the number is negative).
3. Contrapositive of the Original Statement:
- The contrapositive of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( \sim q \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is not positive)
- [tex]\( \sim p \)[/tex] (the number is not negative)
- Therefore, the contrapositive statement is: If the additive inverse is not positive, then the number is not negative.
Given statements:
1. If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (a number is negative) and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive), the original statement is [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
- True. This matches the original statement directly.
2. If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (a number is negative) and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive), the inverse of the original statement is [tex]\( \sim p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex].
- True. This matches what we derived as the inverse.
3. If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (a number is negative) and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive), the converse of the original statement is [tex]\( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p \)[/tex].
- False. This describes the contrapositive, not the converse. The converse should be [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex].
4. If [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (a number is negative) and [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive), the contrapositive of the original statement is [tex]\( \sim p \sim \sim q \)[/tex].
- False. This does not match logical definitions. Additionally, the variables [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] are interchanged in meaning.
5. If [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (a number is negative) and [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive), the converse of the original statement is [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex].
- False. This statement has correct logic but swapped definitions for [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex].
Based on these evaluations, the three correct statements are:
- If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (a number is negative) and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive), the original statement is [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
- If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (a number is negative) and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive), the inverse of the original statement is [tex]\( \sim p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex].
- If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (a number is negative) and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive), the converse of the original statement is [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex].
Therefore, the selected three correct options from the problem are correct.
Given:
- [tex]\( p \)[/tex]: A number is negative
- [tex]\( q \)[/tex]: The additive inverse is positive
The original statement (implication) is [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (a number is negative), then [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive).
We need to find the corresponding logical variations and assess which, among the provided statements, hold true.
1. Inverse of the Original Statement:
- The inverse of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \sim p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( \sim p \)[/tex]: A number is not negative (non-negative or positive or zero)
- [tex]\( \sim q \)[/tex]: The additive inverse is not positive (non-positive or negative or zero)
- Therefore, the inverse statement is: If a number is not negative, then its additive inverse is not positive.
- Formally, [tex]\( \sim p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex].
2. Converse of the Original Statement:
- The converse of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex]:
- If [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive), then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (the number is negative).
3. Contrapositive of the Original Statement:
- The contrapositive of [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex] is [tex]\( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p \)[/tex]:
- [tex]\( \sim q \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is not positive)
- [tex]\( \sim p \)[/tex] (the number is not negative)
- Therefore, the contrapositive statement is: If the additive inverse is not positive, then the number is not negative.
Given statements:
1. If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (a number is negative) and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive), the original statement is [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
- True. This matches the original statement directly.
2. If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (a number is negative) and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive), the inverse of the original statement is [tex]\( \sim p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex].
- True. This matches what we derived as the inverse.
3. If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (a number is negative) and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive), the converse of the original statement is [tex]\( \sim q \rightarrow \sim p \)[/tex].
- False. This describes the contrapositive, not the converse. The converse should be [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex].
4. If [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (a number is negative) and [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive), the contrapositive of the original statement is [tex]\( \sim p \sim \sim q \)[/tex].
- False. This does not match logical definitions. Additionally, the variables [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] are interchanged in meaning.
5. If [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (a number is negative) and [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive), the converse of the original statement is [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex].
- False. This statement has correct logic but swapped definitions for [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex].
Based on these evaluations, the three correct statements are:
- If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (a number is negative) and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive), the original statement is [tex]\( p \rightarrow q \)[/tex].
- If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (a number is negative) and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive), the inverse of the original statement is [tex]\( \sim p \rightarrow \sim q \)[/tex].
- If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] (a number is negative) and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] (the additive inverse is positive), the converse of the original statement is [tex]\( q \rightarrow p \)[/tex].
Therefore, the selected three correct options from the problem are correct.
Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Don't hesitate to keep asking and answering. We value every contribution you make. Find the answers you need at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back soon for more valuable insights.
