Answered

Find solutions to your problems with the help of IDNLearn.com's knowledgeable users. Our community is here to provide detailed and trustworthy answers to any questions you may have.

1.1.3 Quiz: Reading Historical Evidence in U.S. History

Question 8 of 10

Corroborating a historical source requires a historian to:

A. find secondary sources to match a primary source.

B. write a new secondary source using a primary source.

C. identify other sources that make a similar conclusion.

D. determine why a certain source is used by other historians.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

Historians corroborate sources by comparing similar conclusions from different sources, ensuring the reliability of their claims and conclusions in historical analysis.


Explanation:

Corroborating a historical source requires a historian to identify other sources that make a similar conclusion. By comparing multiple sources for agreement or differences, historians can strengthen the reliability of their claims and conclusions.

For example, when analyzing events like the American Civil War, historians may corroborate their findings by looking at various primary sources such as letters, diaries, or official documents to ensure accuracy and develop a well-rounded interpretation.

Understanding the context in which each source was created is crucial to corroborating information effectively and uncovering biases that may impact the accuracy of historical accounts.


Learn more about Historical evidence and corroborating sources here:

https://brainly.com/question/30479572


Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Keep asking and answering. We appreciate every contribution you make. For clear and precise answers, choose IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back soon for more valuable insights.