Answered

IDNLearn.com offers a comprehensive platform for finding and sharing knowledge. Find the answers you need quickly and accurately with help from our knowledgeable and dedicated community members.

Which of the following statements is FALSE?

A. Periodic reductions in populations because of fires or droughts can reduce or eliminate competitive interactions between species.
B. A temporally variable habitat usually leads to the competitive exclusion of competitors.
C. The amount of rainfall can switch the competitive edge between species of grass.
D. Under constant conditions, close competitors usually cannot coexist.
E. Competitive advantages between species can change through time.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

The competitive exclusion principle explains how species competing for the same resources cannot coexist indefinitely, leading to one species dominating and potentially driving the other to extinction.


Explanation:

The competitive exclusion principle states that no two species competing for the same resources at the same time and place can coexist over time. One species will eventually dominate, driving the other to extinction. However, if species evolve to use resources differently, they can coexist.

In natural habitats, species may have competitive advantages in different parts of the habitat or face limitations like predators, allowing less effective competitors to survive. Interspecific competition often leads to extinction of the less well-adapted species due to resource limitations.


Learn more about Competitive Exclusion principle and Interspecific Competition here:

https://brainly.com/question/7182383


Your participation means a lot to us. Keep sharing information and solutions. This community grows thanks to the amazing contributions from members like you. Thank you for visiting IDNLearn.com. We’re here to provide accurate and reliable answers, so visit us again soon.