Get the information you need with the help of IDNLearn.com's expert community. Join our knowledgeable community to find the answers you need for any topic or issue.
Sagot :
To classify the number [tex]\(1.01011011101111...\)[/tex], we need to carefully examine its decimal representation. Let's walk through the determination step-by-step:
1. Definition of Rational and Irrational Numbers:
- Rational Numbers: A number is considered rational if it can be expressed as the quotient [tex]\( \frac{p}{q} \)[/tex], where [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] are integers and [tex]\( q \neq 0 \)[/tex]. Additionally, the decimal representation of a rational number either terminates after a finite number of digits or repeats a fixed pattern indefinitely.
- Irrational Numbers: A number is considered irrational if it cannot be expressed as a simple fraction. In other words, its decimal representation is both non-terminating (goes on forever) and non-repeating (no repeating pattern).
2. Analyzing the Given Number [tex]\( 1.01011011101111... \)[/tex]:
- Let's carefully observe the digits after the decimal point in the number [tex]\( 1.01011011101111... \)[/tex].
- The sequence starts with [tex]\([0101]\)[/tex], then [tex]\([10]\)[/tex], then [tex]\([1110]\)[/tex], and keeps going on with increasingly complicated and non-repeating patterns.
3. Non-Terminating:
- The decimal expansion [tex]\( 1.01011011101111... \)[/tex] does not end. It goes on indefinitely, which means it is non-terminating.
4. Non-Repeating:
- Even more importantly, the sequence of digits after the decimal point does not exhibit a repeating pattern. Each segment grows in length without any fixed period that repeats. For example, we see longer and different sequences occurring rather than a uniform repeating segment such as [tex]\(0.3333...\)[/tex] (which is rational and repeating).
Based on these observations:
- Since the decimal expansion is non-terminating and non-repeating, it cannot be represented as a simple fraction [tex]\( \frac{p}{q} \)[/tex].
Therefore, we conclude that:
- The number [tex]\(1.01011011101111...\)[/tex] is irrational.
This means it cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers, meeting the criteria for an irrational number.
1. Definition of Rational and Irrational Numbers:
- Rational Numbers: A number is considered rational if it can be expressed as the quotient [tex]\( \frac{p}{q} \)[/tex], where [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] are integers and [tex]\( q \neq 0 \)[/tex]. Additionally, the decimal representation of a rational number either terminates after a finite number of digits or repeats a fixed pattern indefinitely.
- Irrational Numbers: A number is considered irrational if it cannot be expressed as a simple fraction. In other words, its decimal representation is both non-terminating (goes on forever) and non-repeating (no repeating pattern).
2. Analyzing the Given Number [tex]\( 1.01011011101111... \)[/tex]:
- Let's carefully observe the digits after the decimal point in the number [tex]\( 1.01011011101111... \)[/tex].
- The sequence starts with [tex]\([0101]\)[/tex], then [tex]\([10]\)[/tex], then [tex]\([1110]\)[/tex], and keeps going on with increasingly complicated and non-repeating patterns.
3. Non-Terminating:
- The decimal expansion [tex]\( 1.01011011101111... \)[/tex] does not end. It goes on indefinitely, which means it is non-terminating.
4. Non-Repeating:
- Even more importantly, the sequence of digits after the decimal point does not exhibit a repeating pattern. Each segment grows in length without any fixed period that repeats. For example, we see longer and different sequences occurring rather than a uniform repeating segment such as [tex]\(0.3333...\)[/tex] (which is rational and repeating).
Based on these observations:
- Since the decimal expansion is non-terminating and non-repeating, it cannot be represented as a simple fraction [tex]\( \frac{p}{q} \)[/tex].
Therefore, we conclude that:
- The number [tex]\(1.01011011101111...\)[/tex] is irrational.
This means it cannot be expressed as a ratio of two integers, meeting the criteria for an irrational number.
Thank you for being part of this discussion. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Thank you for trusting IDNLearn.com. We’re dedicated to providing accurate answers, so visit us again for more solutions.