Expand your horizons with the diverse and informative answers found on IDNLearn.com. Get thorough and trustworthy answers to your queries from our extensive network of knowledgeable professionals.

During an experiment, Juan rolled a six-sided number cube 18 times. The number two occurred four times. Juan claimed the experimental probability of rolling a two was approximately [tex]\frac{1}{9}[/tex]. Which of the following is true about Juan's claim?

A. Juan's claim is incorrect. The correct experimental probability is [tex]\frac{2}{9}[/tex].
B. Juan's claim is incorrect. The correct experimental probability is [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex].
C. Juan's claim is incorrect. The correct experimental probability is [tex]\frac{4}{9}[/tex].
D. Juan's claim is correct.


Sagot :

Let's break down the problem step by step:

1. Calculate the Experimental Probability:
- The number two appeared 4 times out of 18 rolls.
- The experimental probability [tex]\( P(E) \)[/tex] of rolling a two can be calculated using the formula:
[tex]\[ P(E) = \frac{\text{Number of successful outcomes}}{\text{Total number of trials}} \][/tex]
- Substituting the given values:
[tex]\[ P(E) = \frac{4}{18} \][/tex]
- Simplifying the fraction:
[tex]\[ P(E) = \frac{2}{9} \approx 0.2222 \][/tex]

2. Juan's Claim:
- Juan claimed the experimental probability is approximately [tex]\( \frac{1}{9} \)[/tex].
- Let's convert [tex]\( \frac{1}{9} \)[/tex] to a decimal to compare:
[tex]\[ \frac{1}{9} \approx 0.1111 \][/tex]

3. Comparison:
- Comparing the two probabilities:
- Experimental Probability: [tex]\( \frac{2}{9} \approx 0.2222 \)[/tex]
- Juan's Claim: [tex]\( \frac{1}{9} \approx 0.1111 \)[/tex]

4. Conclusion:
- We see that [tex]\( 0.2222 \neq 0.1111 \)[/tex].
- Therefore, Juan's claim is incorrect because the correct experimental probability is [tex]\( \frac{2}{9} \)[/tex].

The correct statement is:
- Juan's claim is incorrect. The correct experimental probability is [tex]\( \frac{2}{9} \)[/tex].