IDNLearn.com is the perfect place to get detailed and accurate answers to your questions. Ask anything and receive well-informed answers from our community of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
Let's break down the problem step by step:
1. Calculate the Experimental Probability:
- The number two appeared 4 times out of 18 rolls.
- The experimental probability [tex]\( P(E) \)[/tex] of rolling a two can be calculated using the formula:
[tex]\[ P(E) = \frac{\text{Number of successful outcomes}}{\text{Total number of trials}} \][/tex]
- Substituting the given values:
[tex]\[ P(E) = \frac{4}{18} \][/tex]
- Simplifying the fraction:
[tex]\[ P(E) = \frac{2}{9} \approx 0.2222 \][/tex]
2. Juan's Claim:
- Juan claimed the experimental probability is approximately [tex]\( \frac{1}{9} \)[/tex].
- Let's convert [tex]\( \frac{1}{9} \)[/tex] to a decimal to compare:
[tex]\[ \frac{1}{9} \approx 0.1111 \][/tex]
3. Comparison:
- Comparing the two probabilities:
- Experimental Probability: [tex]\( \frac{2}{9} \approx 0.2222 \)[/tex]
- Juan's Claim: [tex]\( \frac{1}{9} \approx 0.1111 \)[/tex]
4. Conclusion:
- We see that [tex]\( 0.2222 \neq 0.1111 \)[/tex].
- Therefore, Juan's claim is incorrect because the correct experimental probability is [tex]\( \frac{2}{9} \)[/tex].
The correct statement is:
- Juan's claim is incorrect. The correct experimental probability is [tex]\( \frac{2}{9} \)[/tex].
1. Calculate the Experimental Probability:
- The number two appeared 4 times out of 18 rolls.
- The experimental probability [tex]\( P(E) \)[/tex] of rolling a two can be calculated using the formula:
[tex]\[ P(E) = \frac{\text{Number of successful outcomes}}{\text{Total number of trials}} \][/tex]
- Substituting the given values:
[tex]\[ P(E) = \frac{4}{18} \][/tex]
- Simplifying the fraction:
[tex]\[ P(E) = \frac{2}{9} \approx 0.2222 \][/tex]
2. Juan's Claim:
- Juan claimed the experimental probability is approximately [tex]\( \frac{1}{9} \)[/tex].
- Let's convert [tex]\( \frac{1}{9} \)[/tex] to a decimal to compare:
[tex]\[ \frac{1}{9} \approx 0.1111 \][/tex]
3. Comparison:
- Comparing the two probabilities:
- Experimental Probability: [tex]\( \frac{2}{9} \approx 0.2222 \)[/tex]
- Juan's Claim: [tex]\( \frac{1}{9} \approx 0.1111 \)[/tex]
4. Conclusion:
- We see that [tex]\( 0.2222 \neq 0.1111 \)[/tex].
- Therefore, Juan's claim is incorrect because the correct experimental probability is [tex]\( \frac{2}{9} \)[/tex].
The correct statement is:
- Juan's claim is incorrect. The correct experimental probability is [tex]\( \frac{2}{9} \)[/tex].
We value your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Discover insightful answers at IDNLearn.com. We appreciate your visit and look forward to assisting you again.