IDNLearn.com offers a comprehensive solution for all your question and answer needs. Our experts are available to provide accurate, comprehensive answers to help you make informed decisions about any topic or issue you encounter.

Albert invested money into the stock market, and the table represents his earnings. What type of function could be used to model his bank account as a function of time? Justify your answer.

\begin{tabular}{|l|l|}
\hline
Week & Balance (\$) \\
\hline
1 & 1,426 \\
\hline
2 & 1,528 \\
\hline
3 & 1,630 \\
\hline
4 & 1,732 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}

A. This is a linear function because there is a common difference in the balance between the weeks.

B. This is a linear function because there is a common ratio in the balance between the weeks.

C. This is an exponential function because there is a common difference in the balance between the weeks.

D. This is an exponential function because there is a common ratio in the balance between the weeks.


Sagot :

To determine what type of function can model Albert’s bank account balance over time, we need to analyze how the balance changes from week to week.

Here’s the given data:

Week 1: \[tex]$1,426 Week 2: \$[/tex]1,528
Week 3: \[tex]$1,630 Week 4: \$[/tex]1,732

To determine whether the function is linear or exponential, we need to check either for a common difference (indicative of a linear function) or a common ratio (indicative of an exponential function) between consecutive week balances.

First, let's check for a common difference:

For Week 1 to Week 2:
\[tex]$1,528 - \$[/tex]1,426 = \[tex]$102 For Week 2 to Week 3: \$[/tex]1,630 - \[tex]$1,528 = \$[/tex]102

For Week 3 to Week 4:
\[tex]$1,732 - \$[/tex]1,630 = \[tex]$102 Since the difference between each consecutive week is constant (\$[/tex]102), the changes indicate a common difference, which is characteristic of a linear function.

Next, let's verify there is no common ratio, just for thoroughness.

For Week 1 to Week 2:
[tex]$ \frac{1,528}{1,426} \approx 1.0715 $[/tex]

For Week 2 to Week 3:
[tex]$ \frac{1,630}{1,528} \approx 1.0668 $[/tex]

For Week 3 to Week 4:
[tex]$ \frac{1,732}{1,630} \approx 1.0626 $[/tex]

The ratios are not the same, meaning there is no common ratio.

Therefore, given our findings:
- There is a constant difference (\$102) between the balances each week.
- There is no constant ratio between the balances.

Hence, the balance is modeled by a linear function because there is a common difference in the balance between the weeks. So, the correct statement is:

This is a linear function because there is a common difference in the balance between the weeks.