Answered

Discover new perspectives and gain insights with IDNLearn.com. Ask anything and receive comprehensive, well-informed responses from our dedicated team of experts.

How did the Daubert Standard differ from the Frye Standard?

A. It required stricter adherence to general acceptance.
B. It emphasized the reliability and relevance of scientific evidence.
C. It excluded expert testimony from court proceedings.
D. It prohibited the use of peer-reviewed studies as evidence.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

The Daubert Standard and the Frye Standard differ in their approach to assessing scientific evidence, with the former focusing on reliability and relevance while the latter emphasizes general acceptance.


Explanation:

The Daubert Standard and the Frye Standard differ in their approach to assessing scientific evidence.

The Daubert Standard emphasizes the reliability and relevance of scientific evidence, focusing on the methodology and principles behind the evidence rather than solely on general acceptance by the scientific community.

On the other hand, the Frye Standard required stricter adherence to general acceptance by the scientific community as the primary criterion for admissibility of scientific evidence in court.


Learn more about Daubert Standard vs. Frye Standard here:

https://brainly.com/question/40187176


Your presence in our community is highly appreciated. Keep sharing your insights and solutions. Together, we can build a rich and valuable knowledge resource for everyone. Your questions deserve precise answers. Thank you for visiting IDNLearn.com, and see you again soon for more helpful information.