Answered

Connect with experts and get insightful answers to your questions on IDNLearn.com. Our experts provide timely and accurate responses to help you navigate any topic or issue with confidence.

How did the Daubert Standard differ from the Frye Standard?

A. It required stricter adherence to general acceptance.
B. It emphasized the reliability and relevance of scientific evidence.
C. It excluded expert testimony from court proceedings.
D. It prohibited the use of peer-reviewed studies as evidence.

Sagot :

GinnyAnsweridn

Final answer:

The Daubert Standard and the Frye Standard differ in their approach to assessing scientific evidence, with the former focusing on reliability and relevance while the latter emphasizes general acceptance.


Explanation:

The Daubert Standard and the Frye Standard differ in their approach to assessing scientific evidence.

The Daubert Standard emphasizes the reliability and relevance of scientific evidence, focusing on the methodology and principles behind the evidence rather than solely on general acceptance by the scientific community.

On the other hand, the Frye Standard required stricter adherence to general acceptance by the scientific community as the primary criterion for admissibility of scientific evidence in court.


Learn more about Daubert Standard vs. Frye Standard here:

https://brainly.com/question/40187176


Thank you for joining our conversation. Don't hesitate to return anytime to find answers to your questions. Let's continue sharing knowledge and experiences! Find the answers you need at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back soon for more valuable insights.