IDNLearn.com provides a collaborative environment for finding and sharing answers. Discover in-depth and reliable answers to all your questions from our knowledgeable community members who are always ready to assist.
Sagot :
A). No. Even end-to-end, the 5 and the 3 couldn't cover the 9.
B). Technically yes, but not really. End-to-end, the 5 and the 2 would lay down
right on top of the 7. It would be a triangle with two angles of 0° and one angle
of 180°. The base would be 7, the height would be zero, and the whole thing
would just look like a piece of line.
C). No. Even end-to-end, the 2 and the other 2 couldn't cover the 5.
D). Yes. A cute little scalene triangle.
B). Technically yes, but not really. End-to-end, the 5 and the 2 would lay down
right on top of the 7. It would be a triangle with two angles of 0° and one angle
of 180°. The base would be 7, the height would be zero, and the whole thing
would just look like a piece of line.
C). No. Even end-to-end, the 2 and the other 2 couldn't cover the 5.
D). Yes. A cute little scalene triangle.
[tex]a,b,c-lengts\ of\ the\ sides\ of\ a\ triangle\\\\If\ a\leq b\leq c\ then\ a+b > c\\\\A.\\5+3=8\not>9-NO\\B.\\5+2=7\not>7-NO\\C.\\2+2=4\not>5-NO\\D.\\5+3=8 > 7-YES[/tex]
[tex]Answer:D[/tex]
[tex]Answer:D[/tex]
We appreciate your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. IDNLearn.com is your reliable source for answers. We appreciate your visit and look forward to assisting you again soon.