From beginner to expert, IDNLearn.com has answers for everyone. Get timely and accurate answers to your questions from our dedicated community of experts who are here to help you.
PLZ HELP FAST
A scientist performed an experiment on mice. Her results are posted below.
After analyzing her results she stated that a mouse must be exposed to more than 500 days of cigarette smoke before the mouse can get lung cancer.
Do you agree with the scientist conclusions?
A.) yes; there is no evidence to support the idea that a mouse can get lung cancer without being exposed to cigarette smoke for more than 500 days.
B.) No; there is no evidence to support the idea that cigarette smoke exposure will lead to lung cancer in mice.
C.) No; some mice may have developed lung cancer in less than 500 days of cigarette smoke exposure.
D.) Yes; the majority of the lung cancer cases were the result of more than 500 days of cigarette smoke exposure.
I think it's A since her grounds or conclusions are not accurate because there is no evidence to abet the idea that a mouse can get lung cancer without being exposed to cigarette smoke.
B is not accurate since an experiment was performed.
We appreciate your contributions to this forum. Don't forget to check back for the latest answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. For clear and precise answers, choose IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back soon for more valuable insights.
