Answered

Join the growing community of curious minds on IDNLearn.com and get the answers you need. Receive prompt and accurate responses to your questions from our community of knowledgeable professionals ready to assist you at any time.

greenberg’s argument most differs from hietala’s in that greenberg claims that

Sagot :

Annykslidn

Greenberg's argument is different in that it shows that Americans did not believe that Mexicans in the new territory could assimilate and adapt to American culture.

We can arrive at this answer because:

  • Greenberg was debating the adaptation of Mexican territories and people after the Mexican-American war.
  • While some people argued that assimilating these territories would be a very simple and easy thing to do, Greenberg took a different stance.

He stated that most Americans had doubts that such assimilation would be possible and believed that it would not be easy. He stated that due to cultural, moral, behavioral, and even ancestry differences, some Mexicans would not be able to adapt and assimilate into the new territory.

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/19268585

Your presence in our community is highly appreciated. Keep sharing your insights and solutions. Together, we can build a rich and valuable knowledge resource for everyone. Thank you for choosing IDNLearn.com. We’re committed to providing accurate answers, so visit us again soon.