Answered

Find the best answers to your questions with the help of IDNLearn.com's knowledgeable users. Get the information you need from our community of experts who provide accurate and thorough answers to all your questions.

greenberg’s argument most differs from hietala’s in that greenberg claims that

Sagot :

Annykslidn

Greenberg's argument is different in that it shows that Americans did not believe that Mexicans in the new territory could assimilate and adapt to American culture.

We can arrive at this answer because:

  • Greenberg was debating the adaptation of Mexican territories and people after the Mexican-American war.
  • While some people argued that assimilating these territories would be a very simple and easy thing to do, Greenberg took a different stance.

He stated that most Americans had doubts that such assimilation would be possible and believed that it would not be easy. He stated that due to cultural, moral, behavioral, and even ancestry differences, some Mexicans would not be able to adapt and assimilate into the new territory.

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/19268585

Thank you for participating in our discussion. We value every contribution. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. Let's create a dynamic and informative learning environment together. IDNLearn.com has the answers you need. Thank you for visiting, and we look forward to helping you again soon.