Answered

Find solutions to your problems with the help of IDNLearn.com's knowledgeable users. Our platform provides trustworthy answers to help you make informed decisions quickly and easily.

Sue and tim are arguing about the value of appointing rather than electing federal judges. tim says they are appointed because they need to be independent. what does
he mean?
o judges do not depend on voter will to keep their jobs. if that were the case, then judges would make decisions based on popular will rather than interpretations
of law.
o judges receive their commissions from the president so they are independent in the sense that only the president needs to approve their decisions, not other
officials.
o judges make decisions in isolation from other judges so that their interpretations of the law are not affected by the opinions or judgments of the associate
judges.
o judges are like other federal officials and must consider the people's will when deciding a case, they consult with other officials and the president to make
decisions.

Sagot :

By this statement, Tim wants to say that judges do not depend on voter will to keep their jobs. If that were the case, then judges would make decisions based on popular will rather than interpretations of the law.

Who are federal judges?

Federal judges are judges who serve in a federal court. They are nominated by the president and confirmed by the senate.

Tim means that judges do not depend on voter will to keep their jobs. If that were the case, then judges would make decisions based on popular will rather than interpretations of the law.

Therefore, A is the correct option.

Learn more about Federal judges here:

https://brainly.com/question/15877634

#SPJ1

Thank you for joining our conversation. Don't hesitate to return anytime to find answers to your questions. Let's continue sharing knowledge and experiences! Your search for solutions ends at IDNLearn.com. Thank you for visiting, and we look forward to helping you again.