Explore a wide range of topics and get answers from experts on IDNLearn.com. Our experts provide accurate and detailed responses to help you navigate any topic or issue with confidence.
Sagot :
To solve this problem, let's analyze the given logical implications and determine which statement must be true.
We are given two statements:
1. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow q \)[/tex] (If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true)
2. [tex]\( q \Rightarrow r \)[/tex] (If [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( r \)[/tex] is true)
We need to evaluate the following options:
A. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex]
B. [tex]\( s \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
C. [tex]\( r \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
D. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow s \)[/tex]
Let's consider each option in detail:
Option A: [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex]
1. Given [tex]\( p \Rightarrow q \)[/tex], if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( q \)[/tex] must be true.
2. Given [tex]\( q \Rightarrow r \)[/tex], if [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( r \)[/tex] must be true.
From these two statements, we can link [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( r \)[/tex] using a logical transitivity property. If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] implies [tex]\( q \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] implies [tex]\( r \)[/tex], then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] must imply [tex]\( r \)[/tex].
Thus, [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex] is a valid conclusion and must be true.
Option B: [tex]\( s \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
There is no information given about [tex]\( s \)[/tex] and its relationship to [tex]\( p \)[/tex]. Therefore, we cannot conclude that [tex]\( s \Rightarrow p \)[/tex] must be true.
Option C: [tex]\( r \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
This option suggests that if [tex]\( r \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true. However, there is no information given that directly relates [tex]\( r \)[/tex] back to [tex]\( p \)[/tex]. Hence, we cannot conclude that [tex]\( r \Rightarrow p \)[/tex] is true based on the given information.
Option D: [tex]\( p \Rightarrow s \)[/tex]
Similar to Option B, there is no information given about [tex]\( s \)[/tex] in relation to [tex]\( p \)[/tex]. Therefore, we cannot conclude that [tex]\( p \Rightarrow s \)[/tex] must be true.
After evaluating all the options, the statement that must be true given [tex]\( p \Rightarrow q \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \Rightarrow r \)[/tex] is:
A. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex]
We are given two statements:
1. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow q \)[/tex] (If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true)
2. [tex]\( q \Rightarrow r \)[/tex] (If [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( r \)[/tex] is true)
We need to evaluate the following options:
A. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex]
B. [tex]\( s \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
C. [tex]\( r \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
D. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow s \)[/tex]
Let's consider each option in detail:
Option A: [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex]
1. Given [tex]\( p \Rightarrow q \)[/tex], if [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( q \)[/tex] must be true.
2. Given [tex]\( q \Rightarrow r \)[/tex], if [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( r \)[/tex] must be true.
From these two statements, we can link [tex]\( p \)[/tex] and [tex]\( r \)[/tex] using a logical transitivity property. If [tex]\( p \)[/tex] implies [tex]\( q \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \)[/tex] implies [tex]\( r \)[/tex], then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] must imply [tex]\( r \)[/tex].
Thus, [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex] is a valid conclusion and must be true.
Option B: [tex]\( s \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
There is no information given about [tex]\( s \)[/tex] and its relationship to [tex]\( p \)[/tex]. Therefore, we cannot conclude that [tex]\( s \Rightarrow p \)[/tex] must be true.
Option C: [tex]\( r \Rightarrow p \)[/tex]
This option suggests that if [tex]\( r \)[/tex] is true, then [tex]\( p \)[/tex] is true. However, there is no information given that directly relates [tex]\( r \)[/tex] back to [tex]\( p \)[/tex]. Hence, we cannot conclude that [tex]\( r \Rightarrow p \)[/tex] is true based on the given information.
Option D: [tex]\( p \Rightarrow s \)[/tex]
Similar to Option B, there is no information given about [tex]\( s \)[/tex] in relation to [tex]\( p \)[/tex]. Therefore, we cannot conclude that [tex]\( p \Rightarrow s \)[/tex] must be true.
After evaluating all the options, the statement that must be true given [tex]\( p \Rightarrow q \)[/tex] and [tex]\( q \Rightarrow r \)[/tex] is:
A. [tex]\( p \Rightarrow r \)[/tex]
We appreciate your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Thank you for visiting IDNLearn.com. For reliable answers to all your questions, please visit us again soon.